id these 2

[cookiemonster]

lol! So that's you in the picture modest man? That is awesome!

 

[straitjacketstar]

...but that wild caught factor make me believe it is all RD.

Technically "wild caught". Accurately feral.
It certainly wasn't captured in Amphilophus labiatus' native range so being "wild caught" has nothin to do with nothin in this case.

Wild cought from miami

rd/midas x rd = rd/midas

rd/midas x midas = rd/midas

rd/midas x rd/midas = rd/midas

....anyway you slice it.

 

[balton777]

Technically "wild caught". Accurately feral.
It certainly wasn't captured in Amphilophus labiatus' native range so being "wild caught" has nothin to do with nothin in this case.

Interesting point, I never thought about it that way before.

 

[DJC776]

Or non indigenous!?!?!

Either way that fish has awesome colours. If it is a lack of sunlight reason why they go paler what about a reptile UV flourescent tube instead of normal for the lighting?

Failing that get the sunbed out lol

 

[milkman407]

so is any one gona sex them?

 

[Modest_Man]

I did. Read my post.

"Bottom one is a male. Need a shot of the vent from the top one."

 

[milkman407]

I have new pics up, thats more than enough.