its the same member tats all......i can see how they look like tems but then i can also see how they might be intermedia...its just i absolutely dont see any type of barring at all but they're still small....but i cud be wrong though..best of luck that they turn out to be intermedia to all who got somehennry;4198329; said:
Intermedia, we'll see....
- Thread starter X-Tank
- Start date
hennry;4198320; said:Well great post april but are those from this batch?
here is a pic and the pic from this thread as reference
notice no sign of any sort of bar growth not even the splitting of the horizontal bar that leads to the formation of those bars.
now compare with this picture
common temensis almost identical.
I dont think that you head is processing that they are only around 2". all the pics that are around are 3-4". Alot happends in a few inches..
and what you are trying to compare look nothing like each other..
yeah it's really impossible to tell intermedia vs. temensis at this size.
One thing I noticed is intermedia have that small round ocellar at tail formed very early in comparison to
temensis, the horizontal line kind of extending all the way to tip of tail and form sharp end.
Just look back all the OLD baby intermedia pictures, see all of them have ocellar at tail, but never in temensis at that size.
One thing I noticed is intermedia have that small round ocellar at tail formed very early in comparison to
temensis, the horizontal line kind of extending all the way to tip of tail and form sharp end.
Just look back all the OLD baby intermedia pictures, see all of them have ocellar at tail, but never in temensis at that size.
That is possible, i also have noticed that the end of the horizontal bar in temensis(close to tail area) expands almost to become the size of the skin of the tail area. While intermedia does not do that. Look at the pictures in this thread do you notice it?
