ive been in the navy for two years now and my question is to people who have been in or understand how PTS or perform to serve works. anyone feel free though to respond. is pts unconstitutional and is serving my country a right or a privilage? the navy is the only branch that does this. basically how eligability to re-enlist is determined is by use of an evaluation system as well as physical readiness tests and advancement exams. typically what determines an eval score is professionalism, military appearance, work ethic and knowlage level to your speciffic job as well as the physical readiness tests. unfortunately these evals are just words on paper and sometimes with flawed distributing do to politics (aka ass kissery and best friendalism), but they mean everything to an individual in order to keep the navy a career. and to be promoted to e-4 and above you must have good evals as well as get good scores on advancment exams. which are graded by tossing out the questions that the majority got right and counting the most challenging questions only. which means that 90 out of 100 questions correct could still land you a score of 50% depending on how the rest of the navy did. i however beacuse of this bull **** am going to extend for one year at my last command as an e-4 so ill have six years by then and will be eligable to recieve a higher tenior check and have more time to save up. i wanted to make the navy a career but am tired of jumping through hoops and fighting in an everyman for himself environment. i wont do this to my family for 20 years. what do you think about this crap?