krichardson;4987901; said:I'm sorry but what was your point?
Lol i'm a little confused to.
krichardson;4987901; said:I'm sorry but what was your point?
krichardson;4987901; said:I'm sorry but what was your point?
Fishes33;4987886; said:This 7" Indo is the best that I can find in the petstore
looks similar???
I have to waste $80 to prove my point!!!! *Shake Fist****
Wish I can refund it!!!! >..<
BushFishRox;4988561; said:Where did you find a 7" Dat of any species in the GTA for $80?
pURPLEcHILLIrED123;4989195; said:That may or may not be a ST, CT, VT or Indo, but to me personally, if it does not have the tail pattern... it is an indo to me. It must have the tail pattern for me personally to be considered ST,CT,or VT. Read in another thread that CT/VT with the ST tail patterns were only going for 20% more then what the ST with indo tail patterns... I will gladly pay the 20% more for the ST tail pattern. With out the ST tail pattern... the "CT/VT" will always in the back of my head be suspicious. It must have the ST tail pattern.
sturgeonlover;4989367; said:LOL, I like your dedication in wanting the authentic fish than one that can be marked as fake.




"krichardson;4986213; said:That picture is an indo but for you to say, as you did, that there are no ST is wrong.Period.

pURPLEcHILLIrED123;4989451; said:When you spending that kind of money... you better have no doubt in your mind that whatever you are getting is real.
What if I got the "ST" and my friend comes over and say nice Indo. I'll tell him that an ST with indo tail pattern.
In the back of his head he like - "Righttttt.........
"YOU PAID WHAT???"
Because that is what I would think.