Jag, 2nd opinion

[Angler]

Kinda looks like a female to me.

 

[benzjamin13]

Going by the fins, I'd say female. The colors don't look as bold either to be a male.

 

[fishguts]

id say female due to lack of spotting on tail fin.

 

[RyanP]

Thanks for all the info, im leanin towards female myself.

 

[terd ferguson]

100% female, without a doubt. Shape of the anal and dorsal fins, light coloration without defined spotting, no spotting on tail fin, head shape, all point to female. Plus in one of the pictures, you can almost see a bulge where the breeding tube will pop out, which would explain the cleaning behavior. What are the tankmates, any males?

With regards to sexing jags, it's important to note that just because a fish displays spotting doesn't neccessarily make it a male. I've seen some females with more spotting than some males and vice versa. Usually, at the size of Ryan's fish, a male will have developed a "bump" on his head by now. Not a huge nuchal hump like flowerhorns, but rather a forehead bump just behind the eyes when viewed from the side.

 

[Red Devil]

I say female due to the lack of distinct patterning and its yellow base coloring.

i agree..looks more female to me.. not positive but good quess it is female ..here is my female...

 

[Red Devil]

i agree..looks more female to me.. not positive but good quess it is female ..here is my female...

and by the way it is a beauty.

 

[Amour_ryan]

Female !!

 

[D-Train]

I agree with female... Its a nice one too..