i'm watching the dan patrick show right now as i'm typing this. they were one of the front runners as far as radio hosts and sport shows ripping jo paterno. he just compared the syracuse case and penn state case. said there's really no difference, that joe pa legally did everything he was suppose to do but the media still killed him because morally he could've done more. Same scenario with syracuse, the syracuse post and espn both had that interview with his wife and both have uncovered evidence way back in 2002 and legally did what they were suppose to do.....but once again morally could've done more but no one is ripping them. he also said anyone who knew should feel guilty about any victims after 2002, including the people from espn who sat on the tapes until last week.
jim boehim got a standing ovation in a game 2 days ago.........yet people in here crucifiye joe paterno for a few hundred loyal fans showing up at his place and thanking him for his years of service and voicing their disappointment in him being let go. why are YOU playing the 2 situations differently?
watched the same segment ,at syracuse ,the investigation is really just starting.at jopa u. theres already been an indictment and an arrest so there are A FEW differences +dp dont like the "mothership " and always gets his digs in,but you are right ,its starting to look a little familiar