Judge Judy

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
:D

The jet formally identifes as an Apache helicopter.

In Exhibit A I am travelling upon my Piranha knowledge, apparently not there but still getting something done
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grinch
He came at that thread sideways in my opinion. Hes telling someone to stop posting advice because they didn't keep the fish yet their advice was right. It pissed me off on the right frequency the way he phrased himself. That's all. Then I told Hendre to ignore him in a different thread and he then objected to that. TheKid in typical fashion decided the 3-4 posts we had going back and forth was worth this thread apparently lol.

I think the whole keeping fish comment was more meant as a question seeing if this person had been in the hobby for long, not ignorant but that could have been phrased a bit better as well.

Hey what ya gonna do? I'm now a keyboard warrior army ranger according to those two lol.

Lmaooo man i quoted you with the intent of writing a real reply but the judge assigned to this case cleary list control of the court room amd is in meed.of assistance from his court officers
 
  • Like
Reactions: predatorkeeper87
P predatorkeeper87 your client clearly asked the same question regarding how long or if cwrtain individuals lept said fish with the clear intent of reaching the same point that the other defendant reached.
 
:D

The jet formally identifes as an Apache helicopter.

In Exhibit A I am travelling upon my Piranha knowledge, apparently not there but still getting something done
I knew that jet was one of those new age types....

Its only not viable because you've never seen one in real life, that's what makes knowledge real.
 
I knew that jet was one of those new age types....

Its only not viable because you've never seen one in real life, that's what makes knowledge real.
I have seen them lol. not in a private aquarium though
 
P predatorkeeper87 your client clearly asked the same question regarding how long or if cwrtain individuals lept said fish with the clear intent of reaching the same point that the other defendant reached.

Objection. My client has clearly shown respect for others and admiration for the hobby and the vast knowledge on this site. Though his phrasing was seen as slightly harsh, I cite again his past record of respect for the hobby and the fish therein. Some could also blame the lack of emotion in most text-based communication unless clearly noted.

The defendant however clearly conveyed his emotion as a general jackwagon™, and that because my client has not owned the fish in question while also making wild assumptions that he hasn't even seen one in real life that my client's knowledge of shoving multiple 9" fish into a 70 gallon tank is invalid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hendre
MonsterFishKeepers.com