L190 or L191?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I cant disagree with you for one obvious reason. Not all fish are the same even if theyre the same type.

Ime from the dozens we own between the two households all lost the stripes at 4"-5" sees like the OP has experienced the same.

Thanks for sharing what youve experienced. This why we correspond with each other.

ElectricBlueSeanBurch said:
Well of the dozen or so I've owned some had spotted belly patterns even after the window in the tail has closed up. This fish is still about 1.5" away from that atleast, so I disagree with that completely.
Click to expand...
 
Here guys! I decided to take a picture of my other royal also. Do you see the differences? I couldn't tell the differences between some of the royals except the watermelon but if they are side by side its certainly obvious differences. And pf course price also.

Here they are. DSC_0604.JPG
DSC_0591.JPG
DSC_0595.JPG
DSC_0596.JPG
DSC_0597.JPG
DSC_0598.JPG
DSC_0601.JPG

DSC_0604.JPG

DSC_0591.JPG

DSC_0595.JPG

DSC_0596.JPG

DSC_0597.JPG

DSC_0598.JPG

DSC_0601.JPG
 
The on the on bottom is L27... atleast i think so. Royal experts please chime in!
 
lmt6600 said:
The on the on bottom is L27... atleast i think so. Royal experts please chime in!
Click to expand...

Entirely possible. L27 is my achilles heel as I've never actually owned them. which one was the one we id'ed the 1st time?
 
The first one i think is L190.. I dont really know, i just bought it as "royal".
 
I stick by my first id 330 and the other is 190.

If not 330 and nicely marked 190

27 is a very slim chance and if it is I'd say panaque Armbrusteri aka thunder but it doesn't look like any of the ones I've seen or own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom