C cjfrontlovr Fire Eel MFK Member Feb 10, 2006 1,244 15 68 63 denver,nc.. Aug 15, 2010 #11 96x42 for sure..larger surface area on the bottom and extra width would be needed with any ray.. 9'x3'=27 sq ft 8'x3.5'=28 sq ft
96x42 for sure..larger surface area on the bottom and extra width would be needed with any ray.. 9'x3'=27 sq ft 8'x3.5'=28 sq ft
joey02 Piranha MFK Member May 22, 2007 1,351 79 81 Canada thekingofdiy.com Aug 15, 2010 #12 option two.... more surface area, and wider... even though some may say 6" more width is not a big difference, it really is. If you can, lower the tanks heigth and save some moneny, and put it towards even more width.... 8x4x2 would be best... my motoro tank is 40" wide, and it will not last them much longer...
option two.... more surface area, and wider... even though some may say 6" more width is not a big difference, it really is. If you can, lower the tanks heigth and save some moneny, and put it towards even more width.... 8x4x2 would be best... my motoro tank is 40" wide, and it will not last them much longer...
vamptrev Silver Tier VIP MFK Member Apr 23, 2007 8,226 865 924 Chesterfield MI Aug 15, 2010 #13 wider 4sure. once ur ray gets to 24" your 36" width will deff not be wide enough...
L Leopoldi 541 Feeder Fish MFK Member Aug 15, 2010 8 0 0 springfield,or Aug 15, 2010 #14 Wider is always better for rays.I've always wanted a 10'x4',I think it would be a perfect show tank.
T tanglovers Plecostomus MFK Member Dec 28, 2007 528 56 61 Michigan Aug 15, 2010 #15 I appreciate all the info! I am for sure going 30" tall - there is an existing 520 gallon saltwater tank in the basement and I want the tanks to be the same height. I will go the 42" width, maybe I can find a way to squeeze in 48" without an issue but I do not think this is likely with where the tank is going. Thanks!
I appreciate all the info! I am for sure going 30" tall - there is an existing 520 gallon saltwater tank in the basement and I want the tanks to be the same height. I will go the 42" width, maybe I can find a way to squeeze in 48" without an issue but I do not think this is likely with where the tank is going. Thanks!
G grapedinox Candiru MFK Member Oct 14, 2007 657 9 48 Spokane Wa Aug 21, 2010 #16 I would go option #2 in a heart beat! Wider is always better with rays. And I also agree with 24 inches in height it would cut down costs significantly.
I would go option #2 in a heart beat! Wider is always better with rays. And I also agree with 24 inches in height it would cut down costs significantly.