rayman;1297677; said:
Orbignyi is the only existing species that may have such a wide variation in coloration and distribution. But as said above I think these rays are a undescribed species so I name them P. sp. Peru.
I would agree. Do you know of the specific locales that Orbignyi have been collected from? From what I understand about Motoro sp. "Peru" and it's many brown colored variants, is they are collected from a wide variety of tributaries.
Funny names, laticeps is a synonym for motoro, former used for the "histrix" from Rio Negro, a undescribed species (P. sp. C or P. cf. histrix).
I've noticed different exporters have different theories on Ray ID, it seems to create confusion. I researched the root of 'laticeps' and what you said is pretty much what I collected.. More undescribed variants from Peru, but should all be treated as Peruvian Motoro, No?
Orbignyi, is smaller in maximum size?
I am trying to distinguish if their are 2 different species, each with an immense amount of color pattern morphs.. Maximum size being the issue, but at the same time I am wondering if maximum size is different in every single ray due to hybridization, collection locale, environment, etc..
And yepezi? ok this name for rays with such a coloration comes from the Aqualog. But yepezi is endemic to the Maracaibo region in Venezuela and look very different. Maybe the so called Maracaibo ghost is a real yepezi, who know for shure?:
http://www.amazonasrochen.ch/page/rochen/arten/yepezi.htm
(the last picture at that website show a ray from Peru that was sold as yepezi as example how different they are compared to the rays from Venezuela)
I have seen this 'true' yepezi link before, very interesting. Is their any solid info on why the one from Venezuela is the true yepezi, but I would believe that it is.. While the peruvian collectors needed a new name for their new Orbignyi or Peru Motoro morph, they pulled up Yepezi just like they did Laticeps..
Thanks for the feedback..
