Looking for good filtration that won't break the bank.

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I have seen these and they go by a couple if names all china made! Very mixed reviews some working fine and others saying had to exchange them 3 times. Also a lot of people saying the prime button is a waste of time!


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

Yeah. I feel like all filter reviews should be taken with a grain of salt. Half the ones that are negative are because the item showed up broken or broke before the warranty was up, but it was replaced and that's the end of it. Half the people writing good reviews have used it for 3 days and think its the best thing ever. LOL That's one of the reasons I really want feedback from people on this forum. Many people here have very large tanks for their monster fish and as a result, they know a lot about big filtration. This 125 is the largest tank over 55 gallons I have owned, so I'm pretty new to it.


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
If you are looking for short term budget filtration I would suggest....2aqueon 75s and 2 big sponge filters run on an air pump.... you can add a canister later
 
When stepping up to bigger tanks its part of the deal.. The bigger the tank the more $$$ things cost. Especially filtration. Its also the LAST place you ever wanna skimp. Personally I HIGHLY recommend to have a filtration turn over rate of 8 to 10 time the tank size. I gave up on HOB filters years ago. They do not have the volume or capcity of filtration as a Sump/wet dry or as much as a Canister. Flow rates in HOB's I think are highly over rated. Take your time be patient in your choice here. If you dont your going to end up spending way more then you really needed just to upgrade later.

Canisters are superior to HOB's because a quality rated canister for the right turn over will always out flow the HOB. Also a Canister can hold TONS more Biological filtration along with mechanical filtration. Canisters are also nice as far as reliability and use. As well are concealed easily.

For a 125 gallon tank you need roughly 800 to 1000 gallons per hour. The best canister for that job is the Fluval FX5. It comes in at roughly 900 to 1000 GPH. its huge with tons of media capability. Is it $100 or less? No.. Its about $250. BUT worth it.

Now..

Sumps/Wetdry filtration is superior to Canisters for max filtration, use and creativeness to do things with. If you go and pick yourself up a used Wet dry or a Old 29 gallon tank and convert it to a sump filter youd be set.

Based on what im reading from your posts, I think you should budget, Wait and save the money and either do the Sump or a Canister filter like an FX5. There is NO HOB that can compare. I honestly think going cheap is not in your best interest.
 
For a $100 I would go with two emporer 400's. That'll run a 125 just fine. I used to have a 150 and that was the only filtration I had with 36 african cichlids...no problems at all. Just keep up with water changes.
 
I think what I would like to do is have 2 canister filters on the tank. Just like with having two heaters in a tank, if one of the canisters fails for some reason and I have to wait a few days for a replacement, the other can at least keep the tank from becoming vile before the new filter is added.

The first canister should be no more than $100 (that is as far as I can stretch the budget). The second one will be purchased in 4-6 months with a larger budget (probably $150-200). I definitely want at least 700 GPH turnover rate. Higher if I can get it. But I definitely think it would be a smart move to have two filters rather than one. Plus it will put my mind as ease knowing my fish will be okay for a while if one of the filters fails (like I read so much about in reviews).

Thoughts?


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
I think I am going to stick to canisters! But do I go for fluval fx5 or rena xp3????


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

I get mixed reviews about fluval as a brand. But I read nothing but good things about the FX5. The Rena xp3 gets mostly good reviews. I was an eheim jockey for a long time until I got one of their Jäger heaters that failed. It super heated my water. I caught it at 89 degrees. Everything in the tank was dead except for my rams. Even they were suffering. I was able to scoop them out and slowly acclimate them back down to the normal 81 temp I keep all my SA tanks at. I guess my runner up has been different brands for different things. Fluval would probably take the cake for filters with Rena being a slightly distant second. I am working with ViaAqua brand heaters now. They work well, but I am hoping to eventually save up for the titanium ones. They look better in my opinion and apparently function better because of a temperature control panel that is not inside the heater itself. I read that makes them last longer too. :)

How big is your tank? I would consider the FX5, but my main concern there is the fact that if it fails for any reason, I will have to wait for new filtration to arrive. I don't have any backups waiting. Could be several days of waiting and my fish would suffer or possibly die. But then again, I want a reliable brand for my first canister filters and SunSun gets good reviews, but many people admit they have to buy spare parts because it breaks down. Could be a real hassle and would put me in the situation I am trying to avoid.


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com