LSU doing it big

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
lsu dropped 40 on ore . at a neutral site dropped 40 on w .vir. IN MORGANTOWN .they got plenty of OFFENSE

I think you missed what I was saying. I was just trying to say that both the Tide and LSU have only decent offenses. I dont think anyone would say they have excellent offenses. However, they both have the best defenses in the nation and they are in the NC game where as the explosive offenses of the previously mentioned teams are not in the big game.
 
How about we make a wager like they did for the superbowl.

If LSU wins, the Bama fans have to change there avatars to an LSU avatar of the LSU fans choice for one month and if Bama wins the LSU fans have to change there avatars to to a Bama avatar of the Bama fans choice.

Anyone interested?
 
i think the argument about lsu and bamas opponents could also be reversed....can't someone also argue that those teams they beat still put up more points against them then they did each other?

plus having a GREAT defense that puts you in short field position constantly and contributes a few TDs here and there themselves doesn't make for a great offense. the stats don't lie, their offenses are just alright, not elite. you're a homer if you think they're elite


The fun lil bet you're talking about.....it'd involve 3 people tops cuz no one else has uttered a peep about either team except JD wearing it loud and proud everyday for years on mfk and a couple of people posting on this thread lol
 
thiers 12 or so guys that will be playing NFL football in the NEAR future STARTING IN THAT GAME ,my friend , that is the very definition of good college football

May be your definition of a good college game but still boring as hell. I guess there are no boring games in the NFL by your definition?
 
I think you missed what I was saying. I was just trying to say that both the Tide and LSU have only decent offenses. I dont think anyone would say they have excellent offenses. However, they both have the best defenses in the nation and they are in the NC game where as the explosive offenses of the previously mentioned teams are not in the big game.

no I got it .my point is offense is only 33% of the game. teams like OAKIE ST. and eugene high School play such BAD defense that they gotta play their best game just to be competitive. when the score is 6-3 1 play can win a game for you. when your behind 27 -10,because your defense couldnt catch a cold if they were trapped in a bucket with it, it puts too much pressure on your offense.
 
no I got it .my point is offense is only 33% of the game. teams like OAKIE ST. and eugene high School play such BAD defense that they gotta play their best game just to be competitive. when the score is 6-3 1 play can win a game for you. when your behind 27 -10,because your defense couldnt catch a cold if they were trapped in a bucket with it, it puts too much pressure on your offense.

Eugene high School? funny, ScOregon hasn't fallen behind big in years. back to back to back conference titles, 2 rose bowls appearances, 1 national title appearance. this is with low level recruits, not the 4 and 5 star recruits USC has all throughout their line up. i'm not even an oregon fan but give props where it's due man. Stanford and Scoregon are the only thing keeping the pac 12 relevant right now. we'd be weaker then the WAC or Conference USA if not for those two teams while usc was on probation.

i'm sensing jealousy of the ducks recent success. so what that they're known for scoring alot of points, it's not like their D has been blown up in the last 3 years either. all those losses were lower scoring games, not blow outs. somehow it's the defense's fault though?
 
Eugene high School? funny, ScOregon hasn't fallen behind big in years. back to back to back conference titles, 2 rose bowls appearances, 1 national title appearance. this is with low level recruits, not the 4 and 5 star recruits USC has all throughout their line up. i'm not even an oregon fan but give props where it's due man. Stanford and Scoregon are the only thing keeping the pac 12 relevant right now. we'd be weaker then the WAC or Conference USA if not for those two teams while usc was on probation.

i'm sensing jealousy of the ducks recent success. so what that they're known for scoring alot of points, it's not like their D has been blown up in the last 3 years either. all those losses were lower scoring games, not blow outs. somehow it's the defense's fault though?

just go back to the season opener, lsu trounces eugene hi.you want them to get a re -match ? if so ,whats the point of even having a championship game . at least the tide got it to overtime. by the wayim a pac 12 guy ive seen 30 years of oregon mediocrity followed by 5 years of good. if youwant impressive #s go look at uscs last 50 years and asu from 1960 to 1986 THOSE are streaks of sustained exellence, BY THE WAY WHENS THE LAST TIME EUGENE HI BEAT BOISE ST.
 
May be your definition of a good college game but still boring as hell. I guess there are no boring games in the NFL by your definition?

no point in argueing this ,either you know good football or you dont scores got no relevence WINNING GAMES DOES
 
just go back to the season opener, lsu trounces eugene hi.you want them to get a re -match ? if so ,whats the point of even having a championship game . at least the tide got it to overtime. by the wayim a pac 12 guy ive seen 30 years of oregon mediocrity followed by 5 years of good. if youwant impressive #s go look at uscs last 50 years and asu from 1960 to 1986 THOSE are streaks of sustained exellence, BY THE WAY WHENS THE LAST TIME EUGENE HI BEAT BOISE ST.

lsu did not "trounce" OREGON...nor did i call for a rematch. your'e just making up crap as you go
 
lsu did not "trounce" OREGON...nor did i call for a rematch. your'e just making up crap as you go[/]sounded to me like ......1. oregon is a natoinal power....2. you not happy with the nc game match up ........ who do you want to play ?
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com