wangster11235;851625; said:here is a 4 rotor rx7, made form 2 13b engines, i duno the exact speed, but i bet it can take on that supra anyday
Nic;853575; said:I've wanted a supra for a long time need to get one or a rx7 or something sick and fast
cichlaguapote;854529; said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au7F2ttEXWU
Proabably the one you were gonna post. 26b PP no-turbo or power adder from NZ. I like rx7's(FD's) better too but anything would have a hard time keeping up with that supra.
Just remember that with sick and fast comes broke... whether it's for maintnance or for speed parts.
Sad part is I sold my last FD for chump change years ago and can't touch a decent one now for under 15k. Supra's similar except I don't think they've lost value at all in 10 years.. lol Supras have a higher introduction price but low maintnance costs, and rx7's are just the opposite.
Both cars have their pro's/cons.
---XR---;854547; said:it really depends all on what you consider low matenence costs, just with the engine, even though it was the famous 2JZ, a 10 y/o engine, is still a ten y/o engine, and the more parts you put into it, such as turbo's the faster the engine will wear down, keeping a supra just full of gas isn't cheap, but you are correct with the priceing, sold mine for 43, months ago, and that sucker had 85,000 on the odometer. i miss going fast, but upkeep sucks ass.




