Mike with H20?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
:ROFL:

Maybe in Singapore

Edit: This stuff use to be taught in High School. I can run through this with you but it should of been taught. The presumption of innocents....

Check out the 5th amendment - no person shall be held to answer to a crime unless on an inditement from a grand jury. This kind of stuff can be found on google. I'm just going from memory.

6th and 14th imply a presumption of innocence also.

anyway all I'm saying is this is a one sided argument, it's not fair. This thread should be closed.

sorry for the derail...but.

No..thats here in the states..i dont care about amendments....my government took those away from me a long time a go...

we are not innocent until proven guilty..we are a land that is now you are guilty a pawn being proven innocent.

IF we were a "Innocent until proven guilty" then there would be no bail bonds men and we wouldnt have dumbass TV shows like "Dog the bounty Hunter"

i love my country...but my government sucks....

Ok...sorry for that..
resume the bashing...
 
This is wrong

sorry but no Egon, it was cut and pasted from the NY.GOV website advisory page, an official web-site for NY small claims court......it is the law in the jurisdiction where MIke lives.
Here it is again for you:

"If you don't live -- or do business -- in a state where you are sued, a court normally doesn't have power ("jurisdiction," in legalese) to enter a valid judgment against you, unless court papers are served on you while you happen to be in that state. (Exceptions exist for people who live out of state but own land in the state where the lawsuit was filed or got into a traffic accident in that state.)"

If you want to sue MIke in small claims you have to go to NY. end of.....
 
sorry for the derail...but.

No..thats here in the states..i dont care about amendments....my government took those away from me a long time a go...

we are not innocent until proven guilty..we are a land that is now you are guilty a pawn being proven innocent.

IF we were a "Innocent until proven guilty" then there would be no bail bonds men and we wouldnt have dumbass TV shows like "Dog the bounty Hunter"

i love my country...but my government sucks....

Ok...sorry for that..
resume the bashing...

My Man! Thanks for sharing that.
training-day-a.gif
 
sorry for the derail...but.

No..thats here in the states..i dont care about amendments....my government took those away from me a long time a go...

we are not innocent until proven guilty..we are a land that is now you are guilty a pawn being proven innocent.

IF we were a "Innocent until proven guilty" then there would be no bail bonds men and we wouldnt have dumbass TV shows like "Dog the bounty Hunter"

i love my country...but my government sucks....

Ok...sorry for that..
resume the bashing...

Some shaky reasoning there amigo :)
The burden of proof rests with the accuser.
Even innocent people run away sometimes, but where the preponderance of the evidence points to guilt a custody order prior to trial is probably a good idea isn't it? No-one is gonna lock up anyone over a civil action about money. big derail tho, apologies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com