cassharper;1523717; said:depending the fish I don't think it's morally wrong, just fiscally wrong.
Took the words right out of my mouth. Er...fingers?
cassharper;1523717; said:depending the fish I don't think it's morally wrong, just fiscally wrong.
Alistriwen;1524968; said:I don't see anything morally wrong with it. In nature, weak, sick and just unlucky fish get eaten by bigger fish all the time. Better that than a death where their energy is wasted. Given that people buy fish as feeders all the time I don't think it matters how or where you got the fish either.