RBE17;1324270; said:I was just re-reading your portion on the key valve. If you would reduce the size of the pipe that recirculates to the sump and put less restriction in your return you would get more flow to the tank and wouldn't have to throttle the key valve so much. Your recirculating circuit is the path of least resistance and that's why you have to throttle it back so much. Also, another way to do it is have larger drains from the tank to the sump so there would be more flow into the sump. I know you can't do that now, but if you ever tear it down for an upgrade maybe it would be possible. Again, this tank is gorgeous and there are some very ingenious ideas here. Kudos!!!!
Later,
Steve.
RBE17;1326464; said:I was thinking some more about your recirculation loop w/ the key valve on it in conjunction w/ the drain valves from the tank. Another possible solution that could be incorporated to make it a little easier is the following. Instead of the floats sitting in the sump compartments if it could be incorporated such that the floats had their own compartment that didn't fill up until power was lost. These essentially would be overflow compartments. Once they fill up the floats would rise and close the valves. I realize that this would require more space and is hard to include now, but it's possible it would help w/ the balancing act that needs to be performed. I really like the solution you've provided. I had been thinking a lot on how to have bottom drains w/o it flooding the sump. These are not criticisms, just me thinking on how to make it easier.
Thanks again,
Steve.