REC;496623; said:Your right im wrong your fish at 3.5 inches looked just as good as mine does now......yeah right the pics dont lie bro...........grow up....
![]()
but the pic that you are comparing with is not 3.5" that pic of my fish is not even 2" yet....hehehe...ur right, pics dont lie, look at the size of your fish in the pic and the size of my fish if its 3.5"...since you really like to compare your fish with my fish i'll post the pic of my fish when its 3.5" but i think we should not be comparing our fishes bcoz your fish is a high quality FH while my fish is a low quality, dull FH 
arki;497212; said:you really love to compare your fish with my fishbut the pic that you are comparing with is not 3.5" that pic of my fish is not even 2" yet....hehehe...ur right, pics dont lie, look at the size of your fish in the pic and the size of my fish if its 3.5"...since you really like to compare your fish with my fish i'll post the pic of my fish when its 3.5" but i think we should not be comparing our fishes bcoz your fish is a high quality FH while my fish is a low quality, dull FH
low quality FH
![]()
high quality FH
![]()
JACKOSCAR;497322; said:hahahaha there is no way that pic of yours is 3.5" arki you are full of **** man. I like REC better IMO.
JACKOSCAR;497332; said:SERIOUSLY MAN YOU ARE A JOKE........That airstone in the pic is at least 1" and you could easily liine 3 of them side by side and your fish would still be longer. Old saying "you dont have to lie to kick it".........