DeLgAdO;558610; said:i kept one in a 40 for 2 years, did well.
Chad55;558666; said:Just because you did it doesn't mean it was right. I am sorry if I come off as an ass but that isn't right. Oscars get BIG. They can get 16"+ in extreme cases. It is kinda like keeping an aro in a 150. Alot of people do it and they seem to do ok but the fish probably isnt in that great of health and most likely not very happy.
Chad
I say that they need an absolute minimum of 55 gallons with 75 being much, much better. the extra 1' of swimming space length wise is worth a sacrfice of 3-4" width wise.DeLgAdO;563486; said:i disagree
and an aro in a 150 isnt the same as an oscar in a 40
btw the dimensions of the 40 where 36x16x15
by extreme you mean rare?![]()
DeLgAdO;563486; said:i disagree
and an aro in a 150 isnt the same as an oscar in a 40
btw the dimensions of the 40 where 36x16x15
by extreme you mean rare?![]()
! HahahaChad55;563511; said:Yes rare but almost all get ATLEAST 12". But I guss the 16" wide is actually pretty good for it. I personally think they should be in atleast a 75 with 48"x18". To me that is bare minimum. But everybody is entitled to thier opinion and that is why the japanese have aros in 120s! Hahaha
Chad