yangcliu;4777358; said:Yeah I meant water conditioner, sorry.
What's an HOB? And what are the prices to those filters + sponges compared to the FX5?
Just curious- price isn't a big issue, I'm just a little unexperienced on what to get for the setup.
I got my aro at 5" when my TT eel (very close relative to the fire eel) was around 7-8", and they were fine together (and still are at 26" and 16"), so I'd say they make perfect tankmates as long as there's not a significant size difference between them. I agree with just about everything you said, but for filtration, I think the OP would be better off getting an FX5 and either a higher-end HOB or a smaller canister (ie Rena XP3, Cascade 1200, etc.) if he can afford it.Juxtaroberto;4777262; said:Young arowanas are fragile, and should not be kept with anything that could cause any kind of stress. As I am not familiar with the behaviors of a fire eel, I don't know how appropriate of a tank mate it would be. Mbu puffers are too big, a Fahaka would be perfect for a 180, but Fahakas hate tank mates.
If you want cheap filters, just get a really big HOB, and a couple of sponge filters. Sponge filters are awesome! Seriously, they trap particulates and offer so much biological filtration, and they aerate the water. I'm sure you can find some "energy saving" air pumps somewhere (I know they make water pumps like this...). Is your room 80F, all the time, day or night, no exceptions whatsoever? If so, you don't need a heater. But if there's any chance of that ever falling below 75 for a prolonged period of time, then I'd get a heater.
An arowana will most likely not take pellets, and at 3" they cannot go long without eating. I suggest feeding live food, something like blackworms, which all fish go crazy for, until she reaches a foot (which should be in about 4 months). Then you can try to get her on pellets. It'll be hard at first, but at that size they can go for a long time without eating without any danger to their health.
I don't understand... do you mean water conditioner? I use Prime, by a company called Seachem. You just add it to the water and it's instantly ready to go.
IMO, any spiny eel will probably bring you more pleasure than a senegal bichir, don't get me wrong, I own both and I do find the bichir to be pretty interesting, but if I had to choose one or the other, I'd definitely go with the eel. As for black vs. silver, I'm not really a big fan of blacks. It is awesome that they don't get DE as often, but they often have far less color once they are 24-30", whereas some silvers (like mine) retain quite a bit of color on past the 24" mark (I've seen a few silvers on the internet that were 24"+ and still had 90% of their juvie coloration). And another + to silvers is that they often cost over $200 less than blacks.yangcliu;4777860; said:I see where you're coming from. I thought of it too, but I supposed it would be easier for me to raise it here in my apartment for the first 2-3 months, then permanently move it into (my parent's) house.
I want the fish, so it wouldn't be fair to put the responsibility of taking care of it on my parents and such.
Also- nothing's in my living room besides a coffee table, TV, couch, and some empty furniture so I might as well spice it up.
I've been looking through countless dozens of videos on these fish and I'm still debating what to get.
Right now I'm interested in getting the arowana for sure, and maybe the fire eel, albino bicher, or something else.
I used to just want the silver arowana because it looks the most majestic, despite it being the most common, i think it looks the best.
But now.. the black/blue arowana is growing on me for some reason. Can anyone tell me which one looks better? I've only seen the silver in real life.
-I can probably get my hands on an Asian arowana since I have few contacts through my relatives that own them in the US- but they don't look as good imo.