We own a cattle ranch in Idaho and have permits to run on BLM ground in a high mountain desert. This is a right you have to pay for, at least in Idaho. We are permitted to run so many cattle in each area for so many days. While the is no question ground can be over used, if managed properly the areas that are grazed by cattle are in far better condition than areas that are not grazed at all. The cattle help distribute the grass seed( something that no group of wildlife will do as effectively as there simply aren't enough and most target brush more than grass). They also ensure that the grass and brush( when properly managed) doesn't get to tall and pose extra fire risk. If you think the cattle are harming the turtles, think what a desert brush fire will do to them. There are just way to many man made fire hazards in this day in time to let there be too much fuel for the fire to burn. It is the renters and the BLMs obligation that the area is properly managed. In this case, I have no idea who is doing there part and who isn't. There just aren't enough details to draw any conclusions. What I can say without a shadow of a doubt though is that cattle and the resources they bring, water troughs(which deer and elk heavily use no matter if there are cattle using them or not in my area. They often are seen around the water troughs at the very same time the cattle are watering) healthier stands of foliage due to better distribution of seed and the nutrients that the cattle pass back into the soil. It is in the renters best interest to manage the ground properly because if over used they will not only not be permitted to use the area again until it has been rested, but if overused than the cattle do poorly for years to come if the stands of grass are tromped out. And it is in the BLMs interest to have it grazed because while fires are a natural occurrence, they are better utilized in controlled burns and 9 out of 10 wildfires are caused by people.
Sent from my iPhone using
MonsterAquariaNetwork app