Silvertears;4589847; said:I forget where, but people found a retic python just under 50'. They now keep it in a zoo there. I would like to own that snake. Also A. gig they have tried to find him but no one succeeded. Most of the pictures of it were fakes.
actually, i don't think you can say that for sure. it may be highly unlikely, but to prove it doesn't exist, you'd have to do a sweep of the amazon in one gigantic line of people, with sonar checking the water...snakeguy101;4591291; said:There is no such extant snake.
I agree we have no idea what really is out there. There could be giant snakes hidden someplace where very few people go.A. gigas;4591470; said:actually, i don't think you can say that for sure. it may be highly unlikely, but to prove it doesn't exist, you'd have to do a sweep of the amazon in one gigantic line of people, with sonar checking the water...
this is what i'm saying.snakeguy101;4591925; said:I cant prove that leprechauns exist but I still find it highly unlikely. I just dont think that there would be enough prey items of a large size that could sustain a snake of that size.
Is it possible, sure. Is it likely? Not at all.
capybaras, caimans, jaguars...Masa06;4593160; said:I would find it more plausible if there were LARGE prey items as snakeguy said.
A. gigas;4593453; said:capybaras, caimans, jaguars...
true. but it is still possible.snakeguy101;4593470; said:the number of those it would take to sustain or grow a 50' snake probably far exceeds what is available.