WyldFya Baryancistrus demantoides MFK Member Dec 23, 2005 20,794 67 132 Moscow, ID Apr 4, 2006 #1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scleropages These are the new latin names for the three Asiatic aros that were formally S. Formosus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scleropages These are the new latin names for the three Asiatic aros that were formally S. Formosus.
F Fry Jack Dempsey MFK Member Nov 24, 2005 1,725 1 36 New York Apr 4, 2006 #2 i thought asian arowanas were able to interbreed with fertile offspring, thus the same species? guess i was wrong
i thought asian arowanas were able to interbreed with fertile offspring, thus the same species? guess i was wrong
X xrtg Feeder Fish MFK Member Jun 7, 2005 574 1 0 50 Singapore Apr 4, 2006 #3 I don't get this. "Scleropages macrocephalus (Pouyaud, Sudarto and Teugels, 2003): "Silver variety" Asian arowana" never seen the silver variety of asian arowana. anyone can advise?
I don't get this. "Scleropages macrocephalus (Pouyaud, Sudarto and Teugels, 2003): "Silver variety" Asian arowana" never seen the silver variety of asian arowana. anyone can advise?
benzjamin13 Administrator Staff member Administrator MFK Member Sep 12, 2005 31,603 614 201 Los Angeles, CA Apr 4, 2006 #4 Platium maybe
A alfon76 Gambusia MFK Member Mar 31, 2005 139 0 16 Apr 4, 2006 #5 Never seen or heard of a silver myself. Ivan
R rallysman Polypterus MFK Member Aug 7, 2005 17,543 32 89 43 indiana Apr 4, 2006 #6 cant always trust wikipedia......I think anyone can put any info that they want on there. DNRTFA
X xrtg Feeder Fish MFK Member Jun 7, 2005 574 1 0 50 Singapore Apr 4, 2006 #7 rallysman said: cant always trust wikipedia......I think anyone can put any info that they want on there. DNRTFA Click to expand... really? any idea where can we find the actual names? else this would create further confusion.
rallysman said: cant always trust wikipedia......I think anyone can put any info that they want on there. DNRTFA Click to expand... really? any idea where can we find the actual names? else this would create further confusion.
R rallysman Polypterus MFK Member Aug 7, 2005 17,543 32 89 43 indiana Apr 4, 2006 #8 xrtg said: really? any idea where can we find the actual names? else this would create further confusion. Click to expand... I'm not really sure to tell you the truth. I dont know how wiki. works exactly, but I only use it for "common" stuff. I've found several flaws in things that I look up so I dont put a lot of faith in it.
xrtg said: really? any idea where can we find the actual names? else this would create further confusion. Click to expand... I'm not really sure to tell you the truth. I dont know how wiki. works exactly, but I only use it for "common" stuff. I've found several flaws in things that I look up so I dont put a lot of faith in it.
X xrtg Feeder Fish MFK Member Jun 7, 2005 574 1 0 50 Singapore Apr 4, 2006 #9 WyldFya said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scleropages These are the new latin names for the three Asiatic aros that were formally S. Formosus. Click to expand... hi besides this source is there any other source? authoritative ones?
WyldFya said: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scleropages These are the new latin names for the three Asiatic aros that were formally S. Formosus. Click to expand... hi besides this source is there any other source? authoritative ones?
J Jesse Feeder Fish MFK Member Mar 30, 2005 1,137 1 0 55 Apr 4, 2006 #10 Fishbase.org lists the same valid species of Scleropages. We've been through this in the other thread.
Fishbase.org lists the same valid species of Scleropages. We've been through this in the other thread.
