I thought the logo WAS IN QUESTION, STILL DO.. the name "redskin" isn't owned by SNYDER but the logo is ...AS FAR AS THE COURT RULING ...imo, it may or may not change .. if history is an indication the courts (although they tend to lag) do change as society's values change... very few laws are "set in stone"...FOR THE RECORD .. THIS ISSUE really isn't all that important to me ... my interest is mainly that we can't discuss very many issues on here without the "govt is taking over" crowd screaming bloody murder every time a court ruling or law gets made that doesn't go their way
NFL
- Thread starter jaws7777
- Start date
- Status
my point might be to ask you..how can he respond for the native AMERICANS that are offended?..lots of AFRICAN AMERICANS use the "n" word , but are you gonna call out the ones that ARE offended...???NO ??? that's the SAME thing here
Actually we talk about lots of things here, you only chime in when some complains about government overreach.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
that's total bs and you know it ..I DISCUSS ALL SORTS OF ISSUES ..I just get tired of having to hear the really noisy 10% try and convince themselves and everybody else they are mainstream
If you do discuss all sorts of issues, then you should realize government is only brought up if it insert itself into the particular thing we are talking about. In any case, you make the most noise here; so go find yourself a mirror.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Don't know if you got the memo yet....BUT since original creation of this country,,governments job is to GOVERN...I think you & some others on here might have more of a problem with who you perceive to be at the top of the heap..or you may be an anti- govt type, either way the anti govt rhetoric gets old ..it's what WE have been doing for 240 yrs ...get over itIf you do discuss all sorts of issues, then you should realize government is only brought up if it insert itself into the particular thing we are talking about. In any case, you make the most noise here; so go find yourself a mirror.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Doubtful it is the intention of the founding fathers, or politicians and statesmen for most of the 240 years intended the government to dictate what is offensive, what goes on a label or whether little kids can sell lemonade on the street corner.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
good things that is determined by people OTHER than you...by the way isn't our current govt . the one that allows you to go on websites (and everywhere else )..and denounce them as "overreaching"? ya that's the one...maybe you ought to join a cartel in Mexico and thumb your nose at their govt. see where that gets ya (dead)..how would you possibly know what the founding fathers were thinking.???..you can't even accept the definition of government now...the government HAS been making these decisions for that entire time .. the fact you are just now getting up to "speed" on what they do DOESN'T change the fact that that IS what they do... it's a myth that "this" govt. is doing anything differently than any other... the make and enforce policy and congress makes laws and the courts enforce them ..just like the last 240 yrs..... SOCIETY in general dictates the direction.. I think I have JUST turned into ARCHIE BUNKER
That is interesting. A vast majority of people deem Washington redskins name need not change; so why is government stepping in?
. You are chasing your own tail.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
That is interesting. A vast majority of people deem Washington redskins name need not change; so why is government stepping in?
You are chasing your own tail.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
here we go again..once more for the really s-l-o-w...if you were to take a poll in 1914 you would have found a vast majority in the country didn't find the "N" WORD Offensive ..newsflash.. it ain't about them... that was deemed offensive despite the fact it only offended a minority of the population.. the SAME goes here ,, for the record the name REDSKIN DOESN'T OFFEND ME.. the fact that it offends others makes me deem it unusable in public as a desciption of anyone...here's the test ECOLI WON'T ACKNOWLEDGE....DARE.. GO UP TO any NATIVE American YOU may encounter (and don't know).. call him "redskin".. then come back and tell me what HIS reaction was... chicken????????it's easy to be a keyboard cowboy..let's see you actually put all that rhetoric into action in the real world........film THAT and post the link SKIPPY- Status
