Northfin food

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, here's what I see... A guy that apparently used to sell NLS decided to make his own food that's pretty damn similar and now wants to hop on forums to promote it, gets his friends to help, and gets other members on board by "sponsoring" them with free food.
North fin wouldn't exist without NLS, so bad mouthing NLS on a public forum doesn't look good on north fin. IMO you should be thanking Pablo and his food. 95% of your formula was copied right off the back of his labels.


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

Love it. Well put brother.


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
K I well Im not on the NLS band wagon, and Im not going to jump on it. I am Canadian and I want feed my fish food that is made by a Canadian company. I have lots of fish to feed and have read lots of great reviews on Northfin and can't wait to use it. I have never used GREAT NLS lol and my fish are healthy and look great and my tanks are great. I have been using Wardley Cichlid pellets with great results.
I have never used Northfin either but I can't wait to try it.

I don't care if people think its a copy of NLS, Im sure NLS copied someone just as much as Northfin may have if they even did. Nothing wrong with taking the positives and trying to make something better. Its how we get better food and its how things progress. I just hate in when the NLS "team" gets all up in arms in most discussions about food. To be quite honest it seems ridiculous and thats why I refuse to use NLS regardless of how good the label reads.

Can't wait for RD to shred this one.


Sent from my iPad using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
I can't be bothered, feed your fish rabbit turds for all I care.
 
NorthFin distribution

Lesson #2 on reading fish food labels - crude protein is listed as a minimum value, not maximum. See how that works? It keeps the wannabes guessing,
Sorry you didn't believe my statement that Dr. Quack was tongue in cheek. Doesn't surprise me or hurt me. Not a friend or family, so calling me a liar slides off my back.
You are killing me on the reason for stating minimum requirements on packaging. If you keep saying the same old B.S. over and over again do you actually believe yourself. Probably one of the reasons you have trouble believing others.
The reason the minimum crude protein is listed on the label is because it is the law. Plain and simple, just
like you. Keep wannabees guessing. LOL and LMAO and don't forget the 10 year old BOOM.
The reason they put 34% on their packaging is because that is actually what it is. If they could put a higher amount on it they would but they can't. They would have to reduce their 40% whole wheat flour even more and that would hurt their bottom line.
 
Pongo ..... you lost all credibility in this discussion the moment that you went on the offensive, and began speaking on your close friends behalf. You should have just left it at your initial comments about this food, but seeing as you want to continue to dig a hole for yourself ...........


You are killing me on the reason for stating minimum requirements on packaging. If you keep saying the same old B.S. over and over again do you actually believe yourself. Probably one of the reasons you have trouble believing others. The reason the minimum crude protein is listed on the label is because it is the law. Plain and simple, just
like you. Keep wannabees guessing. LOL and LMAO and don't forget the 10 year old BOOM.
The reason they put 34% on their packaging is because that is actually what it is. If they could put a higher amount on it they would but they can't. They would have to reduce their 40% whole wheat flour even more and that would hurt their bottom line.

I'm sorry, perhaps I wasn't going slowly enough for you. I understand that crude minimums are part of the pet food label requirements regulated by AAFCO, what you apparently failed to grasp is that there is no requirement to post the actual percentage, or even what is often seen in commercial farm feed, what's known as a typical analysis. In the USA, where all of these laws originate, and where all of these laws are enforced via state regulatory bodies, all they care is that the manufacturer meets the minimum values, as listed on the label. No one cares if the protein or lipid content is 10% higher. No manufacturer in their right mind is going to list the exact crude protein amount, because anyone who actually knows what they are talking about knows that from batch to batch those percentages can shift slightly by a point or two, or more. So if one actually has experience in shipping food among different US states they will always play the numbers on the low side, to ensure that they are not breaking any laws. Getting caught being even 1% below the amount stated on the label could result in 10's of thousands of $$$ worth of food being rejected at the border.

Of course this isn't something that you or your pal would know anything about, because you don't live and operate on US soil. Then again, apparently Darius didn't even realize that his food contains hormones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com