So because I feel that the person in the video is giving incorrect info I am somehow taking on a condescending tone?
I don't care how carefully a syringe is slipped into the gastrointestinal tract of a fish, it is just plain stupid, and again, no DVM in their right mind would administer medication to a fish that size in such a manner. Why would they when they can do so in a much safer manner as I previously described, and be just as effective?
I mean hey, if you want to encourage others to blindly use this *mystery* medication from Bangkok that so far we have not even been given the active ingredients of, that's fine by me, but posting a link to that vid certainly didn't help your cause. The person in the vid clearly doesn't understand what he is doing when it comes to deworming a fish, so why would anyone trust his lead when it comes to treating hex/spiro?
BTW - in Bangkok most flowerhorns are a dime a dozen, which is why they are kept in such piss poor conditions & full of worms and hex when they reach the USA.
Also, I have never once stated that an epsom salt treatment is a miracle cure that will heal every sick fish on the planet. Many people on MFK have lost fish to advance stages of spironucleus when treating with various medications, even those medications that have a successful track record decades long, such as Metronidazole. It happens.
The fact remains that there are safer ways to deworm a fish, and treat prolapsed rectums, than hit them with a shotgun approach such as a general cure that treats for everything under the sun. I have stated the same thing about CLOUT for many years - I only recommend it as a last resort due to its caustic nature. Its cancer causing potential is exactly why it is banned in the State of California. What do you reckon Cali would say about your Bangkok medicine?
I'm not saying that "clear" doesn't work, I was simply questioning the information supplied by the person in the video that you linked to. I am not someone who simply nods their head so as to never potentially upset the status quo, and I'm not about to apologize for that.
I don't care how carefully a syringe is slipped into the gastrointestinal tract of a fish, it is just plain stupid, and again, no DVM in their right mind would administer medication to a fish that size in such a manner. Why would they when they can do so in a much safer manner as I previously described, and be just as effective?
I mean hey, if you want to encourage others to blindly use this *mystery* medication from Bangkok that so far we have not even been given the active ingredients of, that's fine by me, but posting a link to that vid certainly didn't help your cause. The person in the vid clearly doesn't understand what he is doing when it comes to deworming a fish, so why would anyone trust his lead when it comes to treating hex/spiro?
BTW - in Bangkok most flowerhorns are a dime a dozen, which is why they are kept in such piss poor conditions & full of worms and hex when they reach the USA.
Also, I have never once stated that an epsom salt treatment is a miracle cure that will heal every sick fish on the planet. Many people on MFK have lost fish to advance stages of spironucleus when treating with various medications, even those medications that have a successful track record decades long, such as Metronidazole. It happens.
The fact remains that there are safer ways to deworm a fish, and treat prolapsed rectums, than hit them with a shotgun approach such as a general cure that treats for everything under the sun. I have stated the same thing about CLOUT for many years - I only recommend it as a last resort due to its caustic nature. Its cancer causing potential is exactly why it is banned in the State of California. What do you reckon Cali would say about your Bangkok medicine?
I'm not saying that "clear" doesn't work, I was simply questioning the information supplied by the person in the video that you linked to. I am not someone who simply nods their head so as to never potentially upset the status quo, and I'm not about to apologize for that.