Admitted! They DO know more about puffer care/growth. You won't find that I have ever done anything more than ASK WHY does the mbu require a 1000g tank? If you bothered to read some of the previous threads on the subject, there was a wide variance of opinion - even on the puffer forum. I went through and linked the varying opinions that went from 400g to 1000g. And if 1000g is the minimum, how come they do great in an 800? That's a 20% smaller than the minimum tank? All I have asked is for people to provide factual evidence or studies and NOT conjecture.geronimo69;4812106; said:I have a Fahaka. It was in a 55 for a few months while I setup his 150. He barely grew in the 55. Once in the 150, he added a good 3" in the first 2 months. This is why I think small tanks stunt young puffers. From experience. EXPERIENCE, in case you missed that.
People on the Puffer Forum know a lot more about puffers and their care/growth than you. Just admit it. People reference that site, cause it's the best source of puffer information around. Stop arguing with scientists (yes, some of them are) that obviously know a lot more than you.
Asking for evidence or something other than "because I said so" isn't a crime, and nor should it be shunned. The fact that you took offense to my comment and are attempting to bait me into argument only reinforces my point above.
As far as your fahaka, congrats. That's great appreciable growth, but doesn't prove the case one way or the other, even if you did EXPERIENCE it. I guess you're assuming that because I ask a question, I don't have experience with puffers or with fish in general?