ok i got the solenoid and not impressed... i'm thinking of returning it and doing the digital timer/float valve route, letting the timer dictate how much water to change/dilute an hour.
ok i'm getting conflicting statements, is a float valve less reliable than a float switch or more? i thought they were prone to sticking? i never tried a veritical float switch like i have now but i've had many liquid level float switches specifically ato fail in my saltwater setup.
In my personal experience float valves are much more reliable than float switches - I've had two float switch failures in about 14 years, my float valves have never had a failure.
A float valve is a simple mechanical device, it can only fail by breaking or being obstructed by mineral build-up or foreign matter. A float switch can fail by breakage, obstruction, corrosion of contacts or wiring, or failure/breakage of internal switch components.
Another factor to look at is how they fail. With float valves the most common failure by far is a slow drip caused by build-up or the wearing-out of the closure. This is the sort of thing you should notice (the sump is slightly fuller one day, or at worst it overflows slightly and you have a little water in your pit) before a catastrophic mess. A float switch failure will result in the sump/ejector pump not turning on and an overflow (of 100+ gallons in a day, in your case).
As far as figures on reliability, it is hard to find anything general, most data focuses on a specific make/model of component rather than float switches or valves in general. However, from my background as a plumber I know that float valves are extremely common (almost every residential toilet employs one) and are very reliable for the huge amount of service they endure. Float switches are found in both sewage and groundwater sumps and are so prone to problems that alarms are required in sumps to alert users of failure.
