Parachromis dovii - a young pair?
- Thread starter HerCrenVie
- Start date
Wow you guys (not everyone, but some people here) are just amazing.
Everybody looks for different things in different fish, and it's laughable that you guys can pass your opinion on as a fact.
By all means express your opinion ('I don't like this fish, doesn't look nice to me' or 'I love my fish, it has in my opinion an amazing blue') but to say 'you have no idea what you're talking about' or 'that fish is ****' based on opinions? Lmao.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, remember that the next time you comment on a fish. A fish that one won't pay a single penny or may be worth hundreds of dollars to others. Keep that in mind.
Everybody looks for different things in different fish, and it's laughable that you guys can pass your opinion on as a fact.
By all means express your opinion ('I don't like this fish, doesn't look nice to me' or 'I love my fish, it has in my opinion an amazing blue') but to say 'you have no idea what you're talking about' or 'that fish is ****' based on opinions? Lmao.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, remember that the next time you comment on a fish. A fish that one won't pay a single penny or may be worth hundreds of dollars to others. Keep that in mind.
On that note though, I like OP's pair. From the pic, they look great. Hope they do well and produce heaps of awesome fry OP. 
Cichlidmayhem's, hybrid or otherwise (don't see why they can't be just a color morph like EBJDs), looks stunning as well, I like 'em.
Comes close second to OP's imo.
Cichlidmayhem's, hybrid or otherwise (don't see why they can't be just a color morph like EBJDs), looks stunning as well, I like 'em.
Comes close second to OP's imo. I apologize OP, don't mind that cry baby he's bitter that he has no quality fish. I had no intentions de railing your thread
I wasn't referring to you man, at least your comments were constructive.
I was referring to him (I think we have the same crybaby in mind, lol) and a certain new arrival to the thread jumping in and chiding everyone for being "amazing"...
@Yank-Keeper-Scott: Lol, if you see it as preaching then that's up to you. People had questions. I answered them. Would be rude to not answer questions and queries posed by people, don't you think? Should I rather ignore them or maybe swear at them or something of the sorts? I truly would rather just follow common etiquette and provide answers, thank you very much.
@HerCrenVie: Twist it how you want, you know I'm chiding you guys for brushing off other people's ideals and applying your own ideals over everyone else. That includes you, Aquatik and the other guy. Especially in fish keeping I find it laughable that people can choose specific characteristics and define those as 'quality' and disregard the rest. Yes there are characteristics that probably should be labeled as low quality, but otherwise it's all up to the beholder. Say what you want, but I will never think of Aquatik's fish as being a quality fish, yet I will think of yours as being better than Aquatik's and the other guy's. And it will be my opinion, and I respect that each of you individually love your own fish, and have different views on other people's fish. That's all I'm saying, perhaps open up your mind a bit. Then again, I guess I'm forcing my own ideals on you people, so don't listen if you truly don't want to, but in the long run it'll help you. Imo.
Would be rude to not answer questions and queries posed by people, don't you think? Should I rather ignore them or maybe swear at them or something of the sorts? I truly would rather just follow common etiquette and provide answers, thank you very much.@HerCrenVie: Twist it how you want, you know I'm chiding you guys for brushing off other people's ideals and applying your own ideals over everyone else. That includes you, Aquatik and the other guy. Especially in fish keeping I find it laughable that people can choose specific characteristics and define those as 'quality' and disregard the rest. Yes there are characteristics that probably should be labeled as low quality, but otherwise it's all up to the beholder. Say what you want, but I will never think of Aquatik's fish as being a quality fish, yet I will think of yours as being better than Aquatik's and the other guy's. And it will be my opinion, and I respect that each of you individually love your own fish, and have different views on other people's fish. That's all I'm saying, perhaps open up your mind a bit. Then again, I guess I'm forcing my own ideals on you people, so don't listen if you truly don't want to, but in the long run it'll help you. Imo.
Can we stop digressing and get back to the OPs fish?
OP- I agree with NWatson on this, they look great so far. Keep the picture updates coming.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
OP- I agree with NWatson on this, they look great so far. Keep the picture updates coming.
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
