What really irks me about the article, is not the frivolous law suit, but this gem of a statement from the reporter:
" Please remember that — regardless of how you feel about first amendment rights — this is a Betta fish we're talking about. Bettas currently retail for $4.59 on PetSmart, and they die all the time"
It should have been: they die all the time due to poor husbandry by their ignorant keepers
.....and since the pet industry tags you at an inexpensive price, your life therefore holds lesser significance.
" Please remember that — regardless of how you feel about first amendment rights — this is a Betta fish we're talking about. Bettas currently retail for $4.59 on PetSmart, and they die all the time"
It should have been: they die all the time due to poor husbandry by their ignorant keepers
.....and since the pet industry tags you at an inexpensive price, your life therefore holds lesser significance.