pH and evolutionary tolerance

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

duanes

MFK Moderators
Staff member
Moderator
MFK Member
Jun 7, 2007
22,689
29,764
2,910
Isla Taboga Panama via Milwaukee
I’ve been doing a little casual research (albeit less than text book) on how long it might take for a species of fish (and the bacteria species it has evolved resistance to, (or not)) looking at history to make adjustments to naturally, and to drastic changes in pH when circumstances force them over time to evolve.
Many aquarists claim, a few years of aquarium breeding may be sufficient to acclimate even some of the most sensitive species to do so.

I’m a little skeptical of those claims, especially because some successful and serious breeders, cater to natural water parameters, where the cichlids they breed, originate.
Living in Panama is a good place to contemplate this natural adjustment, because some of the same species that live in the mineral rich, high pH water here, live in totally opposite water parameters, just across the border in Colombia.
Panama and Colombia are only separated by the Serrania del Darien, Sapo, and Pirre mountain ranges which isolate the two countries and their species at an altitude of 1800 meters, well above where low land species such as tropical cichlids usually traverse.

And the Panamanian mountain range(s) according to geologic theories, only arose from the sea, about 2.5 to 3 million years ago separating the similar species variants from each other.
On the Panamanian side, much the water is mineral rich, with pH at times, above 8, when ancient coral reefs were pushed up from below the sea.
On the Colombian side, pH can drop to as low as 4, and hardly reaches much above 7. And in the much older Andes, rains have long since eroded those coral skeletons away.
Yet similar species are found across both their countries borders.
IMG_3265.jpeg
Andinoacara coeruleopunctus (the smitten image of Andinoacara pulcher) inhabits the high pH, mineral rich waters of Costa Rica, and Panama, and is the only representative of the Andinoacara genus found this far north.
Yet the S American species, Andinoacar pulcher, rivulatus, stalsbergi, biseratus, latifrons, sapyensus, and blombergi are all found west of the Andes far south of the Darien Gap, in drastically different and neutral, water parameters of S America.


Very similarly, only one Geophagine, G crassilabrus is common in Panama, while a few other Geophagines of the red hump clade (G pelligrini, and G steindachneri) are found west and north of the Andes, in neutral parameter conditions, and a host of other Geophagines reside on the east side of the Andes, in markedly soft, low pH water parameters
IMG_1194.jpeg

But not only cichlids.


Whip tail Armored Catfish such as Sturisoma panamense are found in higher pH waters of Panama, while many others of the genus are only common in low pH waters of northern South America.
IMG_7847.jpeg
IMG_7614.jpeg

Other armored catfish of the genus Chaetostoma, are mainly found in South America, yet only species fischeri from that genus is a common rubber lip pleco in areas of Panama bordering the Darien.

IMG_2907.jpegIMG_9476.jpeg

That mountain range appeared between 2.5 and 3 million years ago, separating fish on either side of the geological divide, allowing millions of years and many generation of survival of the fittest to adapt, selectively breed and weed out the best or worst suited individuals for each countries water parameter conditions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tlindsey
A more recent species transfer occurred in the 1960s when 6 Cichla species escaped their pond into lake Gatun.
In only less than 60 years they have come to dominate the predatory cichlid species of lake Gatun, and migrated to other lakes like Bayano, and Arenosa, and its tributaries to the point where endemic cichlids are becoming hard to find in the main lake bodies. Many smaller species are being edged out into smaller rivers by invasive species such as the Cichla, introduced African Tilapines and aquarium releases (?) of South American Oscars.

1778946411882.png

.
 
This is very interesting. And of course there are far more factors at play than we could ever list or understand.

With your explaination, "rains have long since eroded those coral skeletons away." I would assume the Colombian side also got those corals, also saw that spike in mineral rich water, forcing local species to adapt or die out, then the corals depleted and the local waters reverted back. If that is accurate the flip-flop adds to the curiosity.

We're also at a disadvantage, as we are considering the impact of 2.5-3 million years of evolution with only being able to witness species from a single time frame. Who knows what species existed in the middle. I'd wonder if the flip-flop I described actually happened, if the Colombian specimen streamlined like they did on the Panamanian side, then became diverse after the water softened again.

I think the suspicion that, "a few years of aquarium breeding may be sufficient to acclimate even some of the most sensitive species to do so." is closer to the example your second post outlined. A few specimen being thrust into differing water parameters and either learning (evolving) to thrive, or suffering.

And in this later example, I think each species may or may not thrive each parameter change.
There may also be impacts we could never perceive. For example, if the fish mostly thrived in the new parameters, but a single organ suffered, we wouldn't recognize this. And if it caused a fish with the potential to live 12 years die in 8 years, most of us would think 8 years was a good long life.

Considerations like this are very interesting to ponder... but at the end of the day I have to accept I simply don't have enough data to draw a conclusion, nor do I have the formulas to properly consider all the data.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com