I find this very interesting, and must admit somewhat surprising.
Also surprising is the trend shown in Table 2, where the percentage of total foods shows the very high percentage of crayfish consumed. For the large pickerel size class, crayfish compose over half of the diet; for the mid-size fish, it comprised about 1/3 of the diet; only for the small size class diet fish comprised about half of the diet, with a 22.7 value (about 1/4) for crayfish.
Thus, whereas one may expect the pickerels to eat mostly fish, this is not the case. And whereas one may expect the largest pickerels to be capable of and eating more fish (more frequently), the fact is that they reduce their fish intake (over crayfish and insects) during their lifetime.
It is important to note these results are based on fish samples collected between May-August (2005), and that there could easily exist a seasonal component (not addressed or detected here), hereby potentially prey items are present in variable relative abundances on a seasonal basis, thus making less clear whether an actual ontogenic change in preference is the main driver of the results reported.
They did extend their sampling to a number of locations within Indiana, which shows at least partially the generality of the pattern.
Very cool! Thanks for sharing -->