I think King Kong was much better than the 70's remake, it was just done well and is timeless like the original. Charlie and the Chocolate factory were better as well, though I'm neutral on the oompa loompas, there are a lot of LP (little people) actirs who need work, yet the originals freaked me out. I like the fact Depp made Willy more of a scared shut in than a showman, and didn't try to copy Wilder. The rest Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Hills Have Eyes , Amittyville Horror all seem to just want to show off new special effects and with most horror flicks are just gory. Though I like Captain Spaulding and crew as their films are kinda campy and nostalgic. I guess it comes down to how it's done. I would like to see a good remake of Bullitt, only if it's done well though.
Piranha Remake..Coming Soon
- Thread starter skinless
- Start date
Is this a plot movie or a documentary? I think documentaries can be redone without ruining it. OG movies have plots and redone movies kind of move away from the plot or dont have the original creators concept.
Filthy Sanchez said:
I agree but some movies need to be remade the origional spiderman movie....TURD !! the new ones ... TOP BOLLOCKS !! thats just one example there are many more!
DanDanUK said:
Agreed I as I said the new King Kong was great. It was kept timeless, yeah the original spiderman sucked! Then again it was made after UA almost went bankrupt from "Heaven's Gate" which turned Hollywood into a low budget machine for five years or so.
skinless said:
As Good?? that movie is unwatchable sober, guess what makes me mad about it is piranha peranoia, how much you wanna be this movie is used to make more fish illeagal to keep as pets!!
