B boerne Feeder Fish MFK Member Feb 26, 2008 24 0 0 Germany Nov 5, 2008 #11 these rays were as pot. magdalenae imported. is 2 or 3 years ago. surely i can not say that there are pot. magdalenae. meanwhile, i have sold the rays.
these rays were as pot. magdalenae imported. is 2 or 3 years ago. surely i can not say that there are pot. magdalenae. meanwhile, i have sold the rays.
D danzx23 Gambusia MFK Member Apr 20, 2008 140 0 16 st. louis Nov 5, 2008 #12 Nic;2385389; said: the link takes you to the ray in queston... well whats thought is the ray.. Click to expand... are you talking about the link i posted? im tryn to find the picture on the web site miles is refering to ..
Nic;2385389; said: the link takes you to the ray in queston... well whats thought is the ray.. Click to expand... are you talking about the link i posted? im tryn to find the picture on the web site miles is refering to ..
Nic Peacock Bass MFK Member Oct 8, 2005 15,800 14 119 outside philly Nov 5, 2008 #13 danzx23;2389609; said: are you talking about the link i posted? im tryn to find the picture on the web site miles is refering to .. Click to expand... the link he posted too me directly to a picture of the so called ray....
danzx23;2389609; said: are you talking about the link i posted? im tryn to find the picture on the web site miles is refering to .. Click to expand... the link he posted too me directly to a picture of the so called ray....
Miles Stingray King MFK Member Jul 2, 2005 5,547 162 120 Spokane, WA Nov 5, 2008 #14 Scientifically speaking, I think P. magdelanae was originally described in Colombia, from the Rio Magdelana ... and P. Reticulatas was described from far far away from that area.. Maybe Rayman will help?
Scientifically speaking, I think P. magdelanae was originally described in Colombia, from the Rio Magdelana ... and P. Reticulatas was described from far far away from that area.. Maybe Rayman will help?
R rayman Candiru MFK Member Nov 18, 2005 195 1 46 Germany Nov 6, 2008 #15 Hi Miles, now the "armchair experts" do some scientifically speaking It is so easy, look at fishbase and most you find there is the current knowledge, no P. reticulatus there ... : http://filaman.uni-kiel.de/identification/specieslist.cfm?famcode=21&areacode= btw. will someone send them a falkneri picture, because they show a schroederi pic on the falkneri page Pics of P. magdalenae including holotype pics (btw. the drawings seem to be mixed with P. yepezi, both species were found at Rio Catatumbo): http://filaman.uni-kiel.de/Photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=48569
Hi Miles, now the "armchair experts" do some scientifically speaking It is so easy, look at fishbase and most you find there is the current knowledge, no P. reticulatus there ... : http://filaman.uni-kiel.de/identification/specieslist.cfm?famcode=21&areacode= btw. will someone send them a falkneri picture, because they show a schroederi pic on the falkneri page Pics of P. magdalenae including holotype pics (btw. the drawings seem to be mixed with P. yepezi, both species were found at Rio Catatumbo): http://filaman.uni-kiel.de/Photos/ThumbnailsSummary.php?ID=48569