Rare CA/SA Pic thread!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
fishluvr12;3439010; said:
Maybe so, but I'm quite sure this is not a convict either?At least not pure convict.
Click to expand...


no way that fish is a jag. you sure it wasn't labelled as xanthix honduran red point (HRP)? that i would believe and would be something I could see Ken breeding and selling.

:)
 
Here is my Male True Rivulatus 3.75" In a couple pics he's challenging the gold saum.

IMG_0140.JPG

IMG_0228.JPG

IMG_0290.JPG
 
fishluvr12;3439010; said:
Maybe so, but I'm quite sure this is not a convict either?At least not pure convict.
Click to expand...

dude i'm sorry but that is 100% normal white convict... whoever misled you into thinking it was a xanthic jag was clearly misguided as well. i think the opinions are unanimous in that regard. it's a nice fish, but it's a convict.
 
Angler;3439168; said:
Awsome thread. It's nice to see some uncommon Cichlids for a change.

IMO the fish in question is definitely a Pink Con. No big deal - a lot of us have bought fish labeled as something else.
Click to expand...
Yeah but not from a repituble(sp?) vendor like ken. That's a major rip if he did that on purpose
 
franchise513;3440831; said:
Yeah but not from a repituble(sp?) vendor like ken. That's a major rip if he did that on purpose
Click to expand...

It makes zero sense for Ken to do that. Mistakes happen and he has always stood behind his fish and I'm sure he will in this case and take care of any unhappy customers. Why would he purposely sell a few fry for $25 and risk having a bad reputation for a couple hundred bucks. In a month or 2 everyones fry would be big enough to ID and it would be out quickly.
 
Considering 1) a few dozen white fry appeared in a jag brood; 2) it was the frist time those two particular jags bred and 3) Ken doesn't have any pink con in the hatchery....I would have reached the same conclusion. It's just too weird...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
MonsterFishKeepers.com
Top Bottom