zennzzo;2450792; said:Most of my scientific calculations went to the wayside when I started to apply the science...
You can do all the calcs you want but when it comes right down to it, it goes something like this...
Obtain the largest body of water you can possibly fit into a desired spot, don't get comfortable yet, it is only half as big as you'll wind up within months....
then...
Build/buy/trade the biggest Bio/mech filter you can imagine and cycle the body of water...
now, if you did your homework, you'll only need to double the filtration, because you have seriously overstocked this body of water...
and that's because in the back of your mind you know there is no end in sight...just keep building bigger filters, so you can keep bigger/more fish, which means you have to build bigger filters, so you can keep more fish, etc..etc...etc...
Look in the search for filters/bio-loads/...you'll see what I mean...![]()
![]()

Potts050;2430617; said:No argument Neo, there can be no hard and fast rule. There are simply too many variables including but not limited to;
Temperature
pH
The amount of available carbon for BB (kH)
Dissolved oxygen
Micronutrients (gH)
Plant metabolic activity
Light regime
Biodiversity
Food conversion rates
Waste nitrogen percentage in food
Media surface area and surface area to volume ratio
Flow rates
Turn over ratio
Plumbing arrangement (series or parallel/redundant filtration)
Drip systems
Chemical additions (meds, salts, and fertilizers)
Filtration equipment maintenance schedule
Media permeabilty and porosity
Oxygen levels in the media
Presence of dead spots in the tank
Scavenger activity
Disease or fish mortality, and
Driftwood and dead plant material.
OK see if this helps you out...Potts050;2460502; said:Still not to be discouraged from trying to put boundaries on this, is anyone willing to offer what the volume of their biofilters are and the estimated mass of their fish stock?
![]()