The guy who made the vid said (in the comments) that he just made up the title and he realizes that they get much bigger than that.FLESHY;4732009; said:I highly doubt that fish is the "raised record". Especially based off of what some people are saying on here.
Everyone take a good luck at the above tank...not good. RTC looks okay, but that CK looks rough. More space would probably go a long ways for happier, healthier fish.
Hondacrx2;4729359; said:Ok my two cents. Aka meaning it's not worth much. But I have a rtc in a 75gallon. I feed him blood worms and pellets. I keep the water at 73F. I must say the temp must slow their growth. He grew maybe half a inch in a month. And my filtration turns my tank over 14 times a hr!!!! And my water quality is perfect. Take it for what you will or flame away. But on the same note I know I can't keep it in this tank for very long. I am prepared to spend serious money on this fish. Just saying about the growth rate.
people say that you need 1000+ gallon tanks cuz even though it may not reach 4 ft and might only reach around the size of a silver arow. although u may be able to house a full grown arow more comfortably in a 400 gallon, it produces 4x as much poop as one.Deep Blue Sea;4517956; said:I see alot of people getting RTC's on this forum and I always see the person who posts "Hope you have a 1,000+ gallon pond that thing will get to be 5 feet". I find this highly unlikely since the world record was a little over 4'4". Ive seen alot of RTC's in large aquariums, from 300-1000 gallons and it seems like the internet is supersizing this fish, being as Ive never seen a RTC on MFK or in RL over 3 feet unless it was in a HUGE tank like Arapaimags 50k. I also find it funny that the world record Silver Arowana was just a few inches shorter then the world record Red Tail and yet it can be housed more then comfortably in a 400g.
A pet store not far from my house has had a Red Tail for quite a few years in a 7x3x3 and the red tail had plenty of swimming space but has never really gotten much bigger then 2'-2.5'.
I guess the point I'm trying to make here is, I think we give this fish more credit for its size then it really deserves, I personally would think one would do fine in a 400-450g for life. Like every fish theres the odd out out that grows to be HUGE but those are really the only stories anyone pays attention to on the internet and thus it helps inflate the "common adult size" of the fish. There are probably just as many stories on the internet about how one stopped growing at 2.5'-3' even tho it had plenty of room to swim about in yet no one pays attention to those stories.
IMHO I think a better common adult size 2.5'-3.5' and better minimum tank size would be 400g but thats just me, I know TONS of people would beg to differ but this is just my 2 cents.
flowerpower;4733398; said:A rtc is the greatest aquatic pet IMO. I used to have one in a 150. Got him at 4" and a yr later, at around 20", I drove 16 hrs round trip to re-home him. The tragedy with these fish is that they are sooo intelligent and puppy like. He would eat a fish that he grew up with and then sulk for a few days as if he felt guilty (or maybe just digesting a good meal!). You should have to be licensed to own this and other extremely large fish.