Bgonz;707093; said:
Well put Cohazard. I agree with what you stated 100%.
bob
Thanks Bob, I appreciate your support. You brought up a very valid point, something that's been irking me lately.
I feel that it's not right to compare fishkeeping to other pets such as cats and dogs. Fish breed in multiples of 10. The only organisms that have more offspring (per batch) are insects and bacteria. Why? It's not natural for all of the babies to survive. They're food mostly, then a few survive to continue their primary role in the ecosystem.
I say, what's wrong with us keeping them as long as possible, if we get enjoyment out of having their beauty and presence, and respect them while we are in charge of taking care of them? Yeah, their death won't be as efficient as if they were raised for food fish, but it's not going to waste. Once their bodies decompose (sorry to get so grim, but it's reality) the energy stored in their body still gets passed along and recycled.
Also, I want to acknowledge the difference between keeping a fish in an undersized enclosure, and neglect.
The former means you take great care of it. Feed it good food, provide it with clean water; but it will not live to adulthood. The latter means you don't take care of your basic duties... the animal is put through hell, rather than just being a little uncomfortable.
Now, this is going to be hard for some people to be receptive to, because let's face it, RTC's are sort of like aquatic puppies right? It's an illusion. They let us pet them when we've trained them to hand feed, not because they want to play.
Guess what you'll see the beautiful adult RTC's doing at SeaWorld in their giant enclosure? Nothing. Everytime I"ve seen them, they're laying on the bottom of the enclosure, side by side, waiting to be fed.