Red Mammon SKKP 3-4"

[Flowerhorn4you]

HI, I AM THE SUPPLIER OF THESE BEAUTIFUL RED MAMMON AT EASTCOAST USA. THESE RED MAMMON ARE FROM WANNANG BREEDING FARM TAIWAN. ALL OF OUR RED MAMMONS ARE GRADE A.
WHOLESALE ARE WELCOME
WE DO SHIP THESE RED MAMMON THROUGHT FEDEX OVERNIGHT(CONTACT ME FOR SHIPPING QUOTE)

3" UNSEX RED MOMMON $65
4" MALE OR FEMALE RED MAMMON $75
5-6" RED MAMMON $175

7-8" RED MAMMON $688

PRE ORDER IS ALSO AVAILABLE

CONTACT ME FOR PRICE

EMAIL: FLOWERHORN4YOU@GMAIL.COM
OR TEXT 973-876-6807

LOUIS CHANG

 

[BenZino]

Same photos after correction of Tint, Hue, Chroma and Saturation.

Thanks for showing the UN-enhanced photo, it really proves a point.

 

[HKN]

Same photos after correction of Tint, Hue, Chroma and Saturation.

Thanks for showing the UN-enhanced photo, it really proves a point.

I agree...that's marketing for you...

 

[IRONWOOD]

This guy has already been kicked on MFK & aqua-bid

 

[Kollection]

If the un-enhanced photos had originally been shown i might have been interested but now that i see what's going on, no thanks

 

[koltsixx]

Same photos after correction of Tint, Hue, Chroma and Saturation.

The photo's aren't enhanced I bought from him and have seen the tanks in person. Though I will admit that he does use a special colored light to get the colors shown. So as far as I can tell your the only one who used any kind of enhancement on his pics is you. I can't figure out why your trying discredit someone who has only posted once and with pictures you've changed. How do we know that the changes you made to the pics are the true representation of the fish?

Thanks for showing the UN-enhanced photo, it really proves a point.

To be honest their color is better than a BP's but not by much. Mammon's are bought more for their adult shape than anything else.
Here's some pics and I can offer a video as well to show the true color.
View attachment 873030

I agree...that's marketing for you...

The second group of photo's weren't posted by the OP. They where posted by as far as I can tell someone trying to undermine the OP.

 

[gutted]

Not sure if the original pics are enhanced but I talked to the seller before and he does use NAN lighting.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

 

[koltsixx]

Not sure if the original pics are enhanced but I talked to the seller before and he does use NAN lighting.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

Yeah that's what he told me too, informed me before I drove out to him so I don't feel he was dishonest. I've got 4 inch Mammon from him right now and I'm happy, may even pick up another one.

 

[MandM614]

I would love to pick up a couple legit Mammon @ $75 a piece but 1 post? And all this going on?
SCARED...

 

[krustyart]

For the record I made no direct accusations. I simply corrected the photos in accordance with standards used in digital graphic arts. The items that suggested to me that there were enhancements made were, in the first photo, specular color in the driftwood was as red as the fish and in the second photo the specular color was neon purple. "Specular" color is the color of the reflected light that is near to white or in darker colors, off-white because most of that light is reflected instead of one set of frequencies being absorbed. This is often the easiest error to detect in altered photos. Another item that is easily visible is "Saturation". When one color is over-saturated from increasing it to unnatural levels, the color gradient normally decreases to a single color instead of many shades of that color over the body of the object being modified as in the original pictures. Lighting that causes these kinds of effects is just as dishonest as if the photo was altered because the effects are the same. I only corrected the photos to what you would see under 6500*K lighting. Roughly equivalent to daylight frequency(as far as the human eye is concerned . There are many pictures on MFK that are slightly questionable and I would never dream of accusing someone under those circumstances because I have seen even my own pictures come out weird looking some times because I have a cheap camera. However when a photo or set of photos shows insane levels of alteration. I have no qualms about posting corrected photos. I understand that the parent fish my be truly red and the photographer/artist only wanted to reflect the possibility of color that those babies could someday attain under ideal conditions but those fish are not yet at that point.

As to why I would point all this out on his first post? I never even noticed it was his first post. I was sufficiently certain of alterations, either pre-digital or post-digital, to feel comfortable making that post.

I find it very annoying when I see a picture that is excessively amped. I think there is no honest reason to do that. Everyone knows young fish often take time and sometimes ideal care to reach their full potential.