Red monkey FH should i get it?

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
itzshadow;2517474; said:
im gonna need more then luck.... im gonna need a miracle to get enough to buy the fish i want =/

LOL, I only spent $500-600 on black friday and I now I'm pissed because I can't buy any fish.
 
IDK I was always told Kamfa are 99.9% infertile.. And that would apply to RM it seems.
 
cichlaguapote;2518045; said:
IDK I was always told Kamfa are 99.9% infertile.. And that would apply to RM it seems.

99.9% :ROFL::ROFL:

The scientist who told you this is full of it. There are lots of ppl in the FH hobby like to act like they know it all. Using a precise number like 99.9% and such are usually bogus infos from the fact.. Unless there was a testing facility that took 1000 kamfas and tried to breed each of them numerous times then I can follow that.

I do believe that chances for them being INFERTILE is high!! But I've heard of quite a few kamfas having babies. zz crossed or not. Male and female. If it was 99.9%(wow so accurate and precise) of infertile rate, I wouldn't hear about it so much. And also sometimes, ppl don't try hard enough to make it happen so with the first or second time they give up.

My kamfa that I had did three breedings. Only one breeding was good and only a small percentage of eggs made it. In my experience and witness, red eyed FHs had all been fertile. I've heard of white eyes having babies too. But those are, most of the time, infertile.
 
Au Duong Phong;2518426; said:
99.9% :ROFL::ROFL:

The scientist who told you this is full of it. There are lots of ppl in the FH hobby like to act like they know it all. Using a precise number like 99.9% and such are usually bogus infos from the fact.. Unless there was a testing facility that took 1000 kamfas and tried to breed each of them numerous times then I can follow that.

I do believe that chances for them being INFERTILE is high!! But I've heard of quite a few kamfas having babies. zz crossed or not. Male and female. If it was 99.9%(wow so accurate and precise) of infertile rate, I wouldn't hear about it so much. And also sometimes, ppl don't try hard enough to make it happen so with the first or second time they give up.

My kamfa that I had did three breedings. Only one breeding was good and only a small percentage of eggs made it. In my experience and witness, red eyed FHs had all been fertile. I've heard of white eyes having babies too. But those are, most of the time, infertile.

I don't think the 99.9% was meant to be scientifically correct. But more of a way of expressing the chances of it being fertile.

But other than that you basically said everything I meant. I do think there are a few white eyes/kamfa out there that can be fertile. But as you said chance are low.
 
cichlaguapote;2518454; said:
I don't think the 99.9% was meant to be scientifically correct. But more of a way of expressing the chances of it being fertile..

Oh. Ok... I understand.
But that's like saying almost impossible to find a fertile kamfa. It's not. I can agree if the 99.9% is used for RM MALES though. I don't know if anyone at all ever successfully breed a RM male. I've not heard of anyone yet. I can Guarantee you that RM females can be fertile though. I've witnessed.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com