High City Rida;3479147; said:
that is what i thought, but then again afterward they say tem and ocel.
RESTRICTED SPECIES
- Thread starter 100GAL
- Start date
that is what i thought, but then again afterward they say tem and ocel.
WHY ARE YOU TYPING IN ALL CAPS?!?!?!?!? I BELIVE THAT ALL CICHLA ARE RESTRICTED IF IT LISTS IT!!!!
100GAL;3461152; said:
LAW WAS PROBABLY WRITTEN AT THE TIME WHEN THERE WERE ONLY 2 SPECIES OF CICHLA DESCRIBED AND KNOWN TO STATE OF OKLAHOMA.
Isn't it silly where fish are illegal where they couldn't even cause a problem for more than 2 months out of the year?
100GAL;3479121; said:
He's just trying to make you a better person. If I were you, I'd listen.
Oh, and technically, regardless of when the law was written, only Chichla temensis and Chichia ocellaris are banned. I'm sure you can have any other P-Bass you'd like, but I'd ask a pet store. If they don't know the laws, they're put out of business.
Also, as for the texas question, it really depends how it was presented. If "Arapaima, Family Osteoglossidae - Arapaima gigas" is all on one line, or placed similarly to other list items, I think it's safe to assume that only Arapaimas are illegal.
Would this be considered a grammatical loophole?Good one channa.channarox;3483906; said:NO BECAUSE CHICHLA AND CHICHIA ARE RESTRICTED BUT NOT CICHLA.
Yes that is a loop hole and you can get away with that. You should check out Maines list....almost everything is banned and alot of the stuff banned can't even live there cause of the cold weather they get every year let alone all the snow. Move to Rhode Island if you dont want a restricted list 
