The link is fluff, not news. As John pointed out it clearly is identified as an opinion piece, not a researched article. Also it says right in the opinion that the model was intended to be a "worst case scenario" not a forecast of actual future events... And the opinionist keeps bashing on "the Guardian" which has long been known to be hyperbolic and have questionable resources to begin with.
Sadly a new off topic thread
- Thread starter skjl47
- Start date
