channarox;2495803; said:how are we totally sure bigfoots are primates.
they share the same chracteristics,doesnt mean they are totally primates.
Oh right! they are closely related to the unicorns.
channarox;2495803; said:how are we totally sure bigfoots are primates.
they share the same chracteristics,doesnt mean they are totally primates.
that could very well be one of the most logical things ive heard all daycassharper;2496220; said:All the arguments saying bigfoot doesn't exist are about as moronic as the ones saying he does. Wether he exists or not, do you think comparing him to ugly people will add credit to your side? Yeah, it was funny like 100 posts ago.
All humans can base our knowledge on is our perception, or what we have observed. Have we seen a bigfoot? No. Have you ever seen Ghandi in person? Then he must be fake. The point is we cannot negate the fact that one exists just because we don't have proof that it does. What your saying in law could be considered an Adverse inference. Just because someone pleads the 5th does not mean they are guilty of the crime.
Have we observed an 8 foot tall mammalian species with near human intellect, pack mentality, that is very shy? No. Is it possible that the near human intellect of this creature has been what's kept us from observing it? Possibly.
I'm not saying he exists, or that he doesn't. I'm saying blind statements riddled with mock humor just makes you look ignorant.
cassharper;2496220; said:All the arguments saying bigfoot doesn't exist are about as moronic as the ones saying he does. Wether he exists or not, do you think comparing him to ugly people will add credit to your side? Yeah, it was funny like 100 posts ago.
All humans can base our knowledge on is our perception, or what we have observed. Have we seen a bigfoot? No. Have you ever seen Ghandi in person? Then he must be fake. The point is we cannot negate the fact that one exists just because we don't have proof that it does. What your saying in law could be considered an Adverse inference. Just because someone pleads the 5th does not mean they are guilty of the crime.
Have we observed an 8 foot tall mammalian species with near human intellect, pack mentality, that is very shy? No. Is it possible that the near human intellect of this creature has been what's kept us from observing it? Possibly.
I'm not saying he exists, or that he doesn't. I'm saying blind statements riddled with mock humor just makes you look ignorant.
BTB0923;2496281; said:I do agree with most of your post, but....this thread wouldn't be worth reading without the mock humor posts. Its entertaining watching people take sides on such a ridiculous argument, and mocking it is fun. If you don't think its funny then you don't have to read it.

cassharper;2496220; said:All the arguments saying bigfoot doesn't exist are about as moronic as the ones saying he does. Wether he exists or not, do you think comparing him to ugly people will add credit to your side? Yeah, it was funny like 100 posts ago.
All humans can base our knowledge on is our perception, or what we have observed. Have we seen a bigfoot? No. Have you ever seen Ghandi in person? Then he must be fake. The point is we cannot negate the fact that one exists just because we don't have proof that it does. What your saying in law could be considered an Adverse inference. Just because someone pleads the 5th does not mean they are guilty of the crime.
Have we observed an 8 foot tall mammalian species with near human intellect, pack mentality, that is very shy? No. Is it possible that the near human intellect of this creature has been what's kept us from observing it? Possibly.
I'm not saying he exists, or that he doesn't. I'm saying blind statements riddled with mock humor just makes you look ignorant.
BTB0923;2496281; said:I do agree with most of your post, but....this thread wouldn't be worth reading without the mock humor posts. Its entertaining watching people take sides on such a ridiculous argument, and mocking it is fun. If you don't think its funny then you don't have to read it.