Next to the tank of some small oscars, they had written "30+ gallons" for housing. I can't belive that, 55 gallons is the bare minimum for keeping an oscar, alone. Why do they do this?

Trajan230;1151940; said:Who cares if a fish gets put in a tank thats a bit too small for them, they still have a higher live expectancy than wild fish of the same type SO STOP COMPLANING. If you are getting so worked up over a fish, why arent you making a fuss over feeder fish too? They are fish just like oscars, but i guess their small size makes them inferior in every way.
Long story short... GET OVER IT!
Do you really keep fish? Or do you work at petsmart...Trajan230;1151940; said:Who cares if a fish gets put in a tank thats a bit too small for them, they still have a higher live expectancy than wild fish of the same type SO STOP COMPLANING. If you are getting so worked up over a fish, why arent you making a fuss over feeder fish too? They are fish just like oscars, but i guess their small size makes them inferior in every way.
Long story short... GET OVER IT!
Trajan230;1151940; said:Who cares if a fish gets put in a tank thats a bit too small for them, they still have a higher live expectancy than wild fish of the same type SO STOP COMPLANING. If you are getting so worked up over a fish, why arent you making a fuss over feeder fish too? They are fish just like oscars, but i guess their small size makes them inferior in every way.
Long story short... GET OVER IT!