I believe they should be treated well given that they are very intelligent and social creatures but as a human? That's too far imo
Next thing you know rivers will want to marry rivers and use a non river bathroom.Hello; Just saw this. While I have not made up my mind about this as yet, it makes more sense that giving an "ape" human rights.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...hts-as-humans/ar-BByyARA?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=iehp
LMAO!Next thing you know rivers will want to marry rivers and use a non river bathroom.
How many monkeys are you murdering that you're worried about manslaughter charges?Hello; First we need to be on the same page. Chimps and other animals may already some protections under the laws for animal cruelty and property right laws. Bear in mind I am not a lawyer if I get some of this wrong.
Animals and pets fall under property rights of the human owner. If you were to kill an animal in an accident and were found liable then you would only face monetary damage costs. If a chimp were to be given "person rights" like a human has then it could possibly be considered manslaughter depending on how a judge applied the law.
Another might be that some standards that now only apply to humans would apply to chimps. This might be a bit far fetched but might a community be required to offer some form of education like sign language school.
Also bear in mind that apes and chimps are just the "nose under the tent" as rights for many other animals will be pushed once that threshold is breached. Right now there are various animal cruelity laws for our pets and livestock. Imagine if these animals were given human equivalent "people rights".
While it might not be too bad if animal rights activists were reasonable about things, that has not been my observation. Perhaps picture having to provide for an animal pretty much like a human child.
Last in this post is the "pets as slaves" issue. If memory serves form the film I referenced earlier there was some talk about having pets is the same as having a slave. If nothing else this part is and example, to me at least, of how unhinged some of these animal rights movements are.
I think he means in general.How many monkeys are you murdering that you're worried about manslaughter charges?
Hello; So far I have not killed even one. None by accident. I was answering a question with an example of what might become a problem. Sorry it was too complex an example but it is hard to keep things simple. To be more clear, there will be consequences if non-human animals are given "people rights". I can guess at what some problems may be, but likely there will problems no one can anticipate.How many monkeys are you murdering that you're worried about manslaughter charges?
hello; Yes to this.Genetic simillarity sounds great, but really means very little. Chimps are living things and need to be respected, they are also more self aware than a tree or a rat, so need to be treated as such, but they are not human.
Jail time for hunting, no more monkeys in zoos, and zoo keepers to be arrested for human (ape) trafficking. These give animals the same rights as humans thread are awful. If you people actually believe what your saying give your head a shake.So... what would you lose by giving chimps rights?
I'm all for giving apes the same rights as humans...as long as I can still hunt them, which by definition means human then becomes legal game as well.You hunt chimps? Are there wild populations in North America? Are they good eating?