SHRIMP FOR ARO - to cook or not to cook

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
phillydog1958;3532671; said:
cooking, loss of nutrients In general, water‐soluble vitamins and minerals are lost into the cooking water, the amount depending on the surface area to volume ratio, i.e. greater losses take place from finely cut or minced foods. Fat‐soluble vitamins are little affected except at frying temperatures. Proteins suffer reduction of available lysine when they are heated in the presence of reducing substances, and further loss under extreme conditions of temperature. Dry heat, as in baking, results in some loss of vitamin B1, and available lysine. The most sensitive nutrient by far is vitamin C, with vitamin B1 next. Average losses from cereals are: boiling, 40% vitamins B1, B2, B6, niacin, biotin, and pantothenic acid; 50% total folate; baking, 5% niacin, 15% vitamin B2; 25% vitamins B1, B6, and pantothenic acid; 50% folate; with biotin being stable. In meat, losses are approximately 20% of all the vitamins for roasting, frying, and grilling and 20–60% for stewing and boiling.

Thanks!

Gshock;3532697; said:
http://journals.cambridge.org/downl...21a.pdf&code=ddfa4b6874987e9e417e3dfa463249ff

Pretty much sums it up, theres alot of bs mixed into it, but if you read into it, it does summarize the points of how cooking will result in nutrient loss.

Link doesn't work for me.
 
Copied and pasted from the pdf file. Forget about the table cuz its all messed up

164
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY

Summa​
y and Cmlusions

The losses of nutrients in the cooking and plate waste of​
milk, eggs,
fish and meat and the losses in the storage and preparation of vegctables
have been studied. Records are presented also
of waste in school and
other canteens.
Scrambling is the most
wasteful method of cooking eggs. Thermostatically controlled panv
would reduce the waste in cooking eggs.
The filleting of fish in shops would ensure more economic use of the
whole fish.
Plate waste
of meat may be as high as 30 per cent. of cooked meat.
Fat should be removed from plates before vegetables are served, or it
should not be served. Imported meat has a higher plate waste than
home fed.
Plate waste in school canteens includes
7 per cent. of the protein and

7​
per cent. of the fat served. In a college canteen the waste of protein
was
11 per cent. and of fat 5 to 10 per cent. In a Government canteen
6 per cent. of protein and
3 per cent. of fat served were wasted.
The wastage
of vegetables is greatly increased by wilting in storage.
Marketing methods are in great need of improvement. Some system

of​
local market gardens should be adopted so that consumers in large
towns could buy their vegetables fresh. Schools and institutions should
have their own gardens.

I​
would like to thank the School Feeding Dcpartmcnt, Ayr, for pcrmission
to do this work, the Institutional Department in College and my
own students in College for their assistance.

REEERENGES​
Andross,​
M. (1939). Chem. and Ind. 58, 262.

Andross,​
M. (1940). Chm. and Ind. 59, 449.

Andross,​
M. (1941). Chem. and Ind. 60, 176.
McCance,
R. A., Widdowson, E.
M. and Shackleton, L. R. B. (1936).

Olliver,​
M. (1941).

Thc waste in boiling milk is about 10 per cent.​
Spec. Rep.​
Ser.​
med. Res. Coun., Lond.,
no. 213, p. 48.

Ckem.​
a d Id. 60, 586.

Loss​
of Nutrients in Cooking

Dr.​
C. P. Stewart (Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh)

Introduction​
Scattered through the literature arc many papers dealing with the
losses suffered by foodstuffs during cooking. Most of these deal with the
more readily estimated of the inorganic constituents​
and vitamins, some
by analysis of one or two substances in a variety of
foods, others 'by
detailed study of one or two closely related foods.
It is difficult to h d ,
or
to build up, any general view of the subject, partly because of the very
great differences in chemical and anatomical structure between the
various classes
of foodstuffs, partly because the substances which are,

or​
may be, lost are of such varying chemical nature, partly because of the
variety of cooking methods which involve differing physico-chemical
processes, partly because cooking lossos may be qualitative as well
us

NUTRIENT​
LOSSES IN PREPARING FOOD 165
quantitative, and partly because it is not easy to disentangle unavoidable
losses inherent in the process from those due to faulty cooking technique.

It​
is diflicult to decide how the available data nmy best be considered
and presented.
It is not claimed that the one adopted, of considering
foods in three separate classes, vegetables and fruits, meat and fish, and
cereals, would be the best under all circumstances, but it does offer
certain conveniences
for the purpose in view. Nevertheless, it must be
remembered that this arrangement may well lead to the making
of

statements which, though generalIy true, are subject to exceptions
which it may not always be possible to specify.​
It is perhaps well,
also, to utter the reminder that cooking processes may lead to gain in
nutritive value, both quantitative and qualitative, as well as to losses,
although
it is not part of the purpose of this paper to discuss these gains.

Vegetables​
and Fruits

When vegetables are cooked by boiling or steaming, the changes in
quantitative composition seem to​
be the resultant of three actions, the
relative importance of which may vary widely: shrinkage due to collapse

of​
the cell walls and extrusion of the juices, leaching by the boiling water

or​
condensed steam, and hydration.
Many vegetables, when steamed, suffer little
or no loss, whether of
total weight
or of water soluble constituents, and it is noteworthy that
potatoes are included among these. There
is, in these cases, no extrusion
of juices, the amount of condensation
is insuficient for appreciable
leaching
or hydration and, in saturated water vapour, as in boiling, there
is naturally no evaporation. Other vegetables, including root vegetables
such as carrots, swedes, and parsnips, lose up to
30 per cent. or thereabouts
of their water, the amount depending on the temperature of the steam
and the time of cooking, with an approximately equal percentage loss of
their water soluble constituents. In these, shrinkage with extrusion of
juices seems to be the main factor. In still others,
e.g., Brussels sprouts
and cabbage, the losses appear to be small, but cannot readily
be evaluated
since the anatomical structure is such that extruded juices remain trapped
in the spaces between the leaves. Since, however, thcse juices must be
eaten with the leaves the point
is only of theoretical interest.
Boiling vegetables in water obviously increases the chances of hydration
overcoming the tendency to shrinkage by extrusion or diffusion from the
dead cells, and, in fact, boiling results in little
or no change in weight.
The opportunity
for leaching is, however, much greater than in steaming
and, accordingly, the losses of water soluble constituents are considerable
and increase with the duration of cooking as well as, to some extent,
with the volume of water. Thus McCance, Widdowson and Shackleton

(1938),​
found that potatocs, boilcd in about twice their volume of distilled
water for
25 minutes, suffered no appreciable loss of weight, lost only

1​
or 2
per cent. of their starch and protein, but 16 per cent. of their
magnesium, iron, and reducing sugars, 18 per cent. of their potassium,
and
22 per cent. of their chlorine. Thc losses of water soluble salts from
some other vegetables during the normal cooking time were much
greater, for example,
70 per cent. of chlorine from runner beans, 40 per
cent.
of chlorine and of potassium from carrots, and, since in these cases
also the total weight and the water insoluble constituents remained

VOL.​
4, 19161

166​
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY

relatively unchanged, the main cause of loss appeared to be the leaching
action of the water.​
It​
may be objected that these results were obtained by boiling the
vegetables in distilled water. Ordinary tap water contains small amounts
of various salts and in ordinary practice it is common to add others,

e.g.,​
sodium chloride and, in the case of green vegetables, sodium bicarbonate.
Several early workers have claimed that sodium chloride
rcduces the cooking losses from various vegetables
(e.g., Bodinus, 1915;

Gricbel and Miermeister,​
1926), though this was denied by others

(e.g.,​
Masters, 1918; Lang, 1930; Clifford, 1931). McCance et al. (1938),

showed that potato, cooked in​
2 per cent. NaCl solution, absorbed
sodium and chlorine, but lost potassium to the same extent as in
distilled water,
a result to be expectcd on the supposition that the salt
losses during boiling are due to leaching and one which, they point out,
results in
a most useful change in the K:Na ratio from 435 : 5 to 355 : 103.

The loss of calcium during the boiling of vegetables is generally much
less than that of potassium, and may be nil, because calcium so readily
forms insoluble salts which are not removed by leaching. Ziegelmaycr​
(1931)​
reported that whereas potatoes” lost some 25 per cent. of thcir
calcium whcn boiled in distilled water, they might even gain up to
300 per
cent. in very hard watcr. McCance
et al. (1938), doubt whether such
increases ever occur in practice, but substantial increases in the
calcium content of green vegetables have been observed to occur
in practice and to be reproducible by using water of a hardness
found in some parts of the country (unpublished observations by the
author). Similar increases in the iron content of vegetables have also
been found, probably when weak acids liberated during the cooking
have dissolved iron or iron salts from the cooking vessels.
Calcium salts have been shown to delay the “cooking”
(i.e,, the
softening) of vegetables (Viswanath, Row and Ayyangar,
1914-16;

Ziegelmayer,​
1931) and the softening of hard water may be one cause
of thc accelerating effect of sodium bicarbonate. Sodium bicarbonate,
by raising the
pH of the water, seems to increase somewhat the loss of
water soluble salts, but this effect is not great and is almost compensated

by​
the shortening of the cooking time (McCance et al., 1938); by
precipitating calcium salts and
so immobilizing them it tends to
decrease rather than increase the loss of this element.
Baking and frying,
so far at least as potatoes are concerned, appear
to result only in loss of water, the process being one of evaporation.

It​
is evident that cooking in air or fat must be regarded as the most
conservative method of cooking vcgetables
so far as the inorganic constituents
are concerned, that steaming ranks next and is almost equal
in the case of,
e.g., potatoes; while boiling results in considerable losses

of​
all water soluble constituents. Boiling with a very small volume of
water is really partly boiling and partly “stcaming”. It is, however, worth
while, as McCance
et al. (1938) have pointed out, to consider what these
losses, which seem
so large when expressed as a percentage of the amounts
present
in the raw vegetables, really amount to in terms of actual

*​
Potatoes boiled with the skins intact suffer no appreciable loss, even of soluble

S!31t,S,​
NUTRIENT​
LOSSES IN PREPARING FOOD 167

quantities in relation to the daily intake. Table​
1 shows the actual loss
of various substances from 150 g. potato, 50 g. carrots and 50 g. green
peas boiled for the normal time, and contrasts them with the approximate
daily intake. Since these amounts represent at least the average daily
consumption of vegetables, it is evident that the cooking losses cannot
be regarded
as dietetically important.

TABLE​
1

Loss​
OF CERTAIN CONSTITUENTSI N TEE BOILINGO F VEGETABLCEOS MPAREDW ITH

TEIE​
DA~LYI NTAKOEF THESE CONSTITUENTS
Amount
Vegetable g.

Loss​
mg.

----___-​
Carbo-
P​
1 I hycy K I Ca 1 Na Fe
Potatoes
..

Carrots​
..

Greenpeas​
..

Daily intake​
150​
50 30
50​
Total 30​
Though the losses of minerals, as well as​
of carbohydrate and protein,
during the cooking of vegetables appear to be of little nutritional importance,
that is merely because these foods are very minor sources
of

those substances of which the percentage losses are or may be considerable.
The position is, especially in war time, very different with respect​
to

certain vitamins​
of which vegetables form a major source of supply.

A​
survey of the scattered literature suggests that vitamin losses during
the cooking of vegetables are due to the same causes as
losses of salts,

i.e.,​
that they are due largely to leaching. Some ofthe vitamins, however,
are chemically unstable and subject to destruction under the conditions
of cooking, so that in these cases some part of the vitamin is actually
destroyed.
The water insoluble vitamins
or provitamins appear to be little affected
by cooking; this at least has repeatedly been found to be true
of carotene
(Raps, Meinke and Kemmerer, 1941; Oser, Melnick and Oser, 1943).
Water soluble vitamins appear to
bc lost by soaking out and the loss of
them
is, so far as this cause is concerned, affected by the same factors
which affect the loss of minerals, but because of the destructive effects of

cooking​
on the less stable members of this group, losses are much more
variable than in the case
of salts and are affected by factors which have
little effect on salt losses. There is, for example, ample evidence that
the volume
of cooking water has a great effect on the losses of ascorbic
acid and other water soluble vitamins (Olliver, 1941; Oser
et al.,

1943; Ireson and Eheart, 1944; Van Dupe, Chase, and Simpson,
1944). Losses are least, other things being equal, when the volume of
water is kept at​
a minimum end therefore when steaming is substituted
for boiling. For potatoes,
cooking without water, Le., roasting, baking,

VOL.​
4, 10461

168​
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY

or​
frying, gives the greatest retention of vitamin C and, when boiling is
used, retention of the skin affords considerable protection against leaching
(Esselen, Lyons and Fellers,
1942). Vitamin B, and ascorbic acid are
both subject to destruction, t.he former being heat labile especially at
high
pH, the latter subject to oxidation catalysed by copper and by
certain enzymes, this also bcing more rapid at
pH above 6. Accordingly,
the losses are greater
if cooking is slow, and especially by the initial
raising
of the temperature before enzymes have been destroyed (Allen
and Mapson,
1944). The destruction of ascorbic acid and vitamin B,

appears to continue after cooking is complete and the vegetables, exposed
to air, await serving. Thus Nagel and Harris​
(1943) found that in large
scale cooking, potatoes lost
35 per cent. of their vitamin 13, and 45 pcr
cent. of their ascorbic acid; after standing on the hot plate these
losses

were increased to​
70 and 75 per cent'., respectively. Similarly, Kahn
and Halliday
(1944) found that, although potatoes steamed in their skins
lost little
or 110 ascorbic acid even after 50 minutes on the hot plate,
baked potatoes lost
20 per cent. of their ascorbic acid during cooking
and a further
39 per cent. after 43 minutes on the hot plate, while steamed
potatoes whicH had lost
39 per cent. during cooking lost ncarly all the
remainder when mashed and allowed to stand
(cf. Esselen et al., 1942).

The seriousness of this from the nutritional point of view is shown by
the following data. Analyses during April of this year showed that,
given good cooking (boiling) and rapid serving,​
150 g. wholo potato may
supply
9 to 10 mg. of ascorbic acid, and 50 g. of cabbage a like amount,
a total
of two-fifths of the amount suggested as a reasonable daily intake.

If,​
however, the potatoes are mashed and the vegetables are kept hot
for
2 to 1 hour before serving, thc total amount of ascorbic acid derived
from them may be reduced to
2 to 3 mg.

Meat​
and Fish

McCance and Shipp​
(1933) published the results of a careful study of
the water, salt, protein and fat losses incurred in cooking flesh foods.
These investigators found that when heat to over
60°C. is applied to
flesh foods, there is shrinkage of the fibres, which tends to be greater
the higher the temperature, and expression of juices; this occurs irrespective
of the mode of cooking, and
is the most important single source of

loss​
of soluble salts. When meat is boiled, there may be additional salt
loss
by diffusion; when it is cooked in air or fat, water loss by evaporation
is
so great that salts are left on or near the surface and so tend to be conserved.
Protein losses are very variable and dcpcnd on many factors,
the type of flesh food (the kidney, for example, loses more than muscle),
mode of cooking (more being lost in boiling than
in steaming, and roasting
causing the least loss), duration and temperature of cooking, and so on.
They are not negligible, figures of the order of
7 per cent. having been reported
for boiled beef, and up to
20 per cent. for boiled or steamed kidney.
Fat losses are due simply to liquefaction and consequent leakage; they
arc, therefore, very variable, rising to
40 per cent. or more.

It​
is very difficult to assess the practical importance of these losses.
The amounts of soluble salts, though they appear large when expressed

as​
percentages of the amounts present in the raw food are relatively
insignificant in relation to the total daily intake. The
20 per cent. or so

NUTRIENT LOSSES IN PREPARING​
FOOD 169

of iron which is lost may be more serious but there is​
a suggestion in
Odham’s (1941) studies of anaemic rats that it is partly compensated by
an increased “availability” of the iron caused by cooking. The evaluation,
from the nutritional standpoint, of cooking losses is further complicated
by the facts that drippings from meat are partly
or wholly eaten as
gravies
or, in the case of fat, used for other cooking purposes, while the
cooking water from boiled meats is generally used for soup preparation.
The quantitative loss of protein has already been mentioned; there
exists also the possibility of
a qualitative loss. Although McCance and
Shipp
(1933) summarize the earlier literature by stating that “however
it is cooked, meat has been shown to be completcly digested and to lose
little,
if any, of its nutritive value”, there is some evidence to the contrary.
Kapp
(1937) showed that the digestibility of meat in vitro

was reduced from​
86 per cent. to 60 to 64 per cent. by stewing, boiling or
grilling, and to 51 per cent. by roasting. Morgan and Kern
(1934),

using both nitrogen balance and growth methods, found a decrease in
the nutritive value​
of beef muscle protein boiled normally or at 15 lb.
pressure. The
known effects of dry heat on cereal proteins or milk
proteins suggest that roasting
or deep fiyii may well produce similar
decreases in the nutritional value of meat protein. The information
available, however, is insufficient for more than a warning that, in considering
the cooking losses of flesh foods, the possibility of qualitative
changes must be taken into account.
Meat is an important source of certain vitamins of the
B group.
Fortunately most of these substances are moderately heat stable and
so,

though losses occur by the same mechanism as that which brings about
losses of water soluble salts, actual destruction​
is not very great, and a

considerable part of the “lost” vitamins can be found in the drippings.​
It​
seems to be fairly generally agreed (e.g., McIntire, Schweigert and
Elvehjem,
1943; McIntire, Schweigert, Henderson and Elvehjem, 1943;

Cover, McLaren and Pearson,​
1944) that the loss of vitamin B, from beef,
veal, pork
or cured ham, ranges from 20 to 50 per cent. according to the
method and duration
of cooking, with a net destruction of about 20 to
25 per cent. With an average daily intake of 1OOg. of meat and an
average vitamin
B, content of 100 I.U. per 100 g. raw meat there
would be a maximum daily cooking loss of about 50 I.U. of vitamin

B,;​
this could only be serious if, owing to the exclusive use of low
extraction cereals, meat were promoted from a minor to a major source of
vitamin
B,.

The better known members of the vitamin​
B, complex are more resistant
to heat than vitamin
B,; the losses of these substances appear,
as would be expected, to be smaller. Thus, according to the workers
quoted for vitamin
B, losses, the loss of riboflavin ranges from 15 to
25
per cent. (0 to 13 per cent. if the drippinga are included); that of
nicotinic acid fiom
15 to 35 per cent. (0 to 10 per cent. including the
drippings) and of pantothenic acid from 10 to
25 per cent. According
to Schweigert, Nielsen, McIntire and Elvehjem
(1943), 80 per cent. of
the biotin of meat survives cooking. These losses do not seem very serious,
and since they do not seem to be due to faulty technique, they must be
regarded
as the unavoidable penalty of a preference for cooked rather
than raw meat.

VOL.​
4, 19461

170​
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY

C e r d​
The ways in which cereal foods are prepared and cooked are not such
as to lead​
to losses of inorganic comtituents or of protein, fat and carbohydrate,
though, as in other cases, the application of dry heat may somctimes
change the nutritive value
of the proteins.
Cereal foods are important sources of certain vitamins of the B group;
some of these are stable to heat, but others are not and are therefore
susceptible to destruction in baking. Thus riboflavin
is heat stable and
losses in cooking are said to be negligible (Andrews, Boyd and Terry,

1942)​
though, since the substance is destroyed by light, exposure of cut
slices
of bread may result in some loss. Vitamin B,, on the other hand,
is more readily destroyed by heat, especially at high
pH. Dawson and

Martin​
(1942) state that white bread, made with a vitamin rich yeast,
loses about
8 per cent. of its vitamin B, in baking, bread from 85 per cent.
extraction flour about
27 per cent., and wholemeal bread about 35 per
cent.; Schultz, Atkin and Frey
(1942) give the average baking loss as

20​
per cent. under normal large scale conditions and add that the loss is
greater in the crust than in the crumb. There is, it appears, increasing
loss with increasing temperature and various workers have called attention
to the extra loss in toasting bread
(e.g., Downs and Meckel, 1943)

and in biscuit making​
(e.g., Barackman, 1942). The effect of pH on
loss
of vitamin B, is shown by the greater loss involved in the use of
baking powders than in that of yeast. Thus, Wilson
(1942) reported
that yeast bread contained
2.1 I.U. vitamin B, per g., whereas comparable
bread made with baking powder, with cream of tartar as the
acid constituent, contained only
1.3 I.U. per g. Barackman (1942)

found that when “self raising” flours were used​
for biscuit making,with
water mixing, the
pH was 8-5 and the vitamin B, loss 51 per cent.; at

pH​
6-7, however, the loss was only 9 per cent. Decreased loss, with
lowered
pH, was obtainable by using milk for mixing, or by adding acid
calcium phosphate to the flour.
It seems that, as one would expect from
the known behaviour of pure vitamin
B,, the loss in cereal cooking is
minimized by preserving as low a
pH as possible and by avoiding excessive
heating. This probably applies also to certain members of the
vitamin B, complex, the stability of which resembles that
of vitamin B,.

REFEREN~ES​
Allen,​
J. R. L. and Mapson. L. W. (1944).
Andrews,
J. S., Boyd, H. M. and Terry, D. E. (1942).
Barackman,
R. A. (1942).
Bodinus (1915).
Clifford, W.
M. (1931).
Cover,
S., McLaren,
B. A. and Pearson, P. B. (1944).
Dawson,
E. R. and Martin, G. W. (1942).
Downs, D.
E. and Meokel, R. B. (1943).
Esselen,
W.
B. (Jr.). Lyons, M. E. and Fellers, C. R. (1942).
Fraps,
G. S., Meinke, W. W.
and Kemmerer, A. A. (1941).
Griebel,
C. and Miermeister. A. (19262.
Ireson,
M. G. and Eheart, M. S. (1944).
Kahn,
R. M.
and Halliday, E. G. (1944).

Kapp,​
H. (1937).
Lang,
T. (1930).

J. SOC. chem.​
Id., Lond., 63, 78.

Cereal Chem.​
19, 55.

Cereal Chenz.​
19, 121.

Phrm.​
Ztg., Berl., 60,
188.

Biochem.​
J. 25,
1999.

J. Nutrit.​
27, 363.

J.​
Soc. them. Id., Lond.,
61, 13.

Cereal Chem. 20,​
352.

Bull.​
Mass.
agric.

J.​
Ass. off.
ayric.

Exp.​
Sta.
no. 360.

Chem., Wa8hh.​
2, 4, 739.

2.​
Untersueh. Lebemitt.
52, 458.

J. Home​
Econ.
36, 160.

J.​
Amw. diet. Ass. 20, 220.
Arch. VerdauKr.
61, 123.

Schweiz.​
med. Wschr. 60,
219.

NUTRIENT LOSSES IN​
PREPARING FOOD 171

McCance,​
R. A. and Shipp, H. L. (1933). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond.,

no.​
187.

McCance,​
R. A., Widdowson, E. M. and Shackleton, L. R. B. (1938). Spec. Rep.

McIntire, J. M., Schweigert,​
B. S. and Elvehjem, C. A. (1943). J. Xutrit. 26, 621.

McIntire,​
J. M., Schweigert, B. S., Henderson, L. M. and Elvehjem, C. A. (1943).

Masters,​
H. (1918).

Morgan,​
A.
F. and Kern, G. E. (1934).

Nagel,​
A. H. and Harris, R. S. (1943).

Odham,​
H. G. (1941).

Olliver, M.​
(1941). Chem. and Ind. 60, 686.

Oser, B.​
L.,
Melnick, D. and Oser, M. (1943).

Schultz,​
A. S., Atkin, L. and Frey, C. N. (1942).

Schweigert,​
B. S., Nielsen, E., McIntire, J. M. and Elvehjem, C. A. (1943).

Van Duyns, F. O., Chase,​
J. T. and Simpson, J. I. (1944). Food Res. 9, 164.

Viswanath,​
B., Row, T. L. and Ayyangar, P. A. R. (191616).

Wilson,​
E. C. G. (1942).
Ziegelmayer, W.
(1931).

Ser. med. Res.​
Goun., Lond.,
no. 213.

J. Nutrit.​
25,
143.

Biochem.​
J.
12, 231.

J. Nutrit.​
7, 367.

J. Amer. diet.​
Ass.
19, 23.
J.
Nutrit. 22,
197.

Food Res.​
8, 115.

Cereal​
Chenz.
19, 532.

J.
Nutrit.​
26,
65.

Mem. Dep. A@.​
India.​
Chem.
4, 149.

N.Z.​
J.
Sci. Tech. , 24, 35.

2.​
Ernahr.
1, 25.

Discussion​
Dr.​
J.
C. Thompson (Food Research Laboratory, Barkers (Contractors),
Ltd., c/o Morris Motors, Ltd., Cowley, Oxford), opener: The problem of
the loss of ascorbic acid in food is one which has aroused considerable
interest in recent years, particularly with food prepared on a large scale
as
for industrial canteens and British Restaurants. This is because
there are certain processes peculiar to large scale catering which can
cause the loss of considerable amounts of ascorbic acid.
Although the emphasis is on ascorbic acid because more estimations of
the ascorbic acid content of foods have been made and more is known
of its properties, this is simply because it is the easiest of the readily lost
vitamins to estimate. As
it is one of the most readily destroyed, and as
the properties which lead to its disappearance from food,
i.e., by being
soluble in water, by being heat labile and by destruction by alkalis,
are equally shared by other vitamins, particularly vitamin
B, and
members of the vitamin B, complex, it is safe to assume that if the
ascorbic acid content of vegetables is satisfactory, the content
of the
other vitamins is assured. There are of course obvious exceptions to
this assumption,
e.g., dried legumes are rich in vitamin B, but are devoid
of ascorbic acid.
The methods of cooking vegetablcs
so as to conserve the greatest
amount of ascorbic acid have been widely advertised by the Ministry

of​
Food. All vegetables should
be prepared, cooked and served as quickly as possible and with tho
minimum physical destruction of the vegetables,
e.g., cabbage should be
coarsely shredded with
a sharp knife and potatoes should not be mashed.
Expensive cooking, that
is cooking involving large material waste, such

as​
the discarding of the outer green leaves of cabbage and the peel of
potatoes, or high fuel consumption because of the huge quantities
of

water used, produces food of inferior nutritive quality.
There are two aspects of large scale cooking​
I would like to mention,
the use of bicarbonate of soda in the cooking of greens and the storage of
food in the hot plate.

VOL.​
4, 19481

They may be summarized as follows
 
henward;3532588; said:
yes, thats my thing, i am wondering where the proof is.
i mean vges are different - vitamins denature under heat.
proteins dont denature at all under heat, well most dont anyways.
vitamins... how much vitamins does prawns have?

i dont cook it, you buy it cooked or raw, it doesnt matter - its same price per kilo for same products just one is raw and one is cooked.

i am trying google but no luck on raw and cooked info


let me google that for you
... so there you go... three hundred and twenty seven thousand links for you to read over and decide for yourself... some are more scientific than others.. some show their proof some dont.. some are total crap..

im not sure how many shrimp a fish of any type eats in the wild.. but im going to go ahead and guess that even if its only one... its a raw shrimp..

but since you are packing them with pellets im going to guess that from a "health" point of view... it does not matter at all..
 
chester makes a good point. If you are stuffing it w/ pellets, it doesn't matter much.
 
I had a roommate once that did the raw diet. That's pretty much the point of the diet - you eat only raw food because they're more nutritious and aid in digestion moreso than cooked foods.

Also, shells naturally contain CHITIN and Carotene, which develops your fishes scale strength and color.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com