Silver Arows may be banned in coming years!

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

Waldo

Feeder Fish
MFK Member
Jul 11, 2005
586
3
0
43
Spokane WA
Article from OFI secretary Alex Ploeg


From Practical Fishkeeper

SILVER AROWANA UNDER THREAT
The aquarium trade could be placing the Silver arowana under threat. The killing of mouth brooding Silver arowana to remove their offspring and export them for the global aquarium trade may be placing the species under threat according to a new study.

The Silver arowana, Osteoglossum bicirrhosum, is a paternal mouth brooding osteoglossid fish that reaches a length of over 1m/39" and is one of South America's most popular food fish species. It is also of commercial importance to the aquarium industry and in 2001 the export of one million juvenile Silver arowana contributed around $560,000 to the rural poor of Peru, according to official records. However, the actual number of arowana exported could be as much as 20% higher.

According to a new study by Marie-Annick Moreau and Oliver Coomes of McGill University, which has just been published in the journal Oryx, the export of Silver arowanas in Peru has been on the rise for several years and the killing of reproductive males could threaten the sustainability of the fishery. Moreau and Coomes claim that the species' life-history characteristics, including the small number of offspring it produces, make it unsuited to the heavy exploitation it is facing from both the aquarium trade and the food fish industry.

"Two osteoglossid species with similar biological traits are already listed on CITES to protect wild populations from collection for the aquarium and food fish trades", the authors wrote. "No similar international trade restrictions are in place for the Silver arowana, and little information is available on the status of wild populations in Peru or elsewhere in South America. Arapaima gigas is categorised as Data Deficient on the IUCN Redlist, but O. bicirrhosum has yet to be evaluated.".

More research needed
The authors emphasise that determining whether the aquarium trade poses a threat to the species is challenging: "Research to determine whether stocks are declining, as seems likely given the current levels of off take, would need to be conducted over several years and in different fishing areas, and would need to determine whether exploitation for the aquarium trade is the primary cause of any decline or whether other factors (eg. direct fishing for food, bycatch capture by other fisheries and habitat degradation/destruction) also act singly or jointly to reduce fishing yields."

Moreau and Coomes suggest that guidance in the sustainable use of the Silver arowana fishery is needed, rather than an outright ban on the sale of the species, as there is an absence of supporting data on the conservation status of the species. "To ban the trade outright would deny an important source of income to the rural poor, destabilise an export economy that is estimated to directly employ up to 14,000 people in Peru and that provides important foreign earnings to Amazonian countries, and would probably shift exploitation to other vulnerable Amazonian aquarium fish species, such as river stingrays."

++++++++++

With kind regards,

Alex Ploeg
OFI Secretary General
 
It does not come unexpected does it?
They tell me that my arowana was extacted from her parents mouth and that they had to kill the fish and cut it's jaws to extract the fry.

Fishkeeping puts several species under threat. On the other hand it sort of "promotes" nature. I mean, never mind scientists, if it weren't for the Zoos and the pets, would the human population care if all not-to-be-consumed animals went extinct?
 
Fishkeeping puts several species under threat. On the other hand it sort of "promotes" nature. I mean, never mind scientists, if it weren't for the Zoos and the pets, would the human population care if all not-to-be-consumed animals went extinct?

:iagree:
 
I am also worried about clown loaches. They are not bred in captivity and if they are banned, I will dive from my roof head first (figuratively).
 
Personally I wish all of the fish would be available in the hobby, I just wish they would be priced much higher. It is impossible to teach idiots, by far the majority of the fish being bought are being put into small tanks that are not taken care of simply because if the fish dies they can go ahead and pick up another one for a couple of bucks.

If a Silver Arowana would cost couple of hundred bucks, people would get proper setups, and appreciate the fish by far more.

It does not matter what fish, even a guppy should not be a buck.
 
My goal as an exporter is not to hurt the environment. Asia buy's thousands of boxes of baby arowanas. The market is 10k^x and it is only maxed by the amount that we can collect. I would support farms and it would not kill me to see some competition from them.
 
Personally I wish all of the fish would be available in the hobby, I just wish they would be priced much higher. It is impossible to teach idiots, by far the majority of the fish being bought are being put into small tanks that are not taken care of simply because if the fish dies they can go ahead and pick up another one for a couple of bucks.

If a Silver Arowana would cost couple of hundred bucks, people would get proper setups, and appreciate the fish by far more.

It does not matter what fish, even a guppy should not be a buck.

With all due respect Vitaliy, that is absolute nonsense. Your overly moralistic attitude seems to be playing tircks on you sometimes.

Why should a guppy cost more than a child? Children are free. Any Human so-called Sapiens can reproduce in unlimited amounts totally free of charge. Moreover we are encouraged to do so by our Governments, we receive tax benefits, subsidies, rent money, etc not to mention the Pope's praise.
Your idea might make some limited sense for species like the Arowanas. But why guppy? Would you charge $100 for a cockroach?
 
With all due respect Vitaliy, that is absolute nonsense. Your overly moralistic attitude seems to be playing tircks on you sometimes.

Why should a guppy cost more than a child? Children are free. Any Human so-called Sapiens can reproduce in unlimited amounts totally free of charge. Moreover we are encouraged to do so by our Governments, we receive tax benefits, subsidies, rent money, etc not to mention the Pope's praise.
Your idea might make some limited sense for species like the Arowanas. But why guppy? Would you charge $100 for a cockroach?
Because the prices for various pets are so cheap people no longer respect or appreciate them. For every Oscar that is being sold in a pet store, how many of them going into a proper tank? How many of them will be alive in a year? How many fish are being sold in pet stores? How many of them will be alive in a year?

Hamster is a joke pet now, its not considered to be a big deal because it is almost expected for the thing to die. Every year around Easter millions of rabbits are sold only to be brought back the next day.

Same thing with dogs, cats, and all other animals in the pet trade. If a pet would cost some money people would think twice before buying it and taking care of it.

What do human children have to do with this?

Thanks for calling me a moron.
 
That would be a sad day to see a ban on silver aros. BUT if thats what it would take to preserve the species for future generations, I would be for it.

Give fair warning though, so I can buy up all the silvers I can get my hands on.:naughty:
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com