skimmer or uv

[JIM]

Use both they do different things.

 

[mikeinnj]

are there any better brands of skimmers or once you get in the same price range are they basically the same

 

[BIGgourami]

are there any better brands of skimmers or once you get in the same price range are they basically the same

i disagree with this, but generally is somewhat true

i got a CPR BakPak dual pro for $120
Seaclone 150's are $120 at petsmart

 

[Deano1956]

you sure dont need a skimmer for startup. I run fish only tanks (no live rock or skimmer) with success and no casualties, but I did break down and buy a uv sterilizer only because I couldnt pass up the deal. 36 watt for 50 buck and it is like new

 

[sweeTang21]

skimmer and watts??? are you talking lighting?

 

[Mantis411]

the bulb in the UV is what the watts is about, definitely go for the skimmer, and liverock will probably only make keeping fish easier

 

[sweeTang21]

ahh duh lol, maybe read it better lol

 

[Deano1956]

No I edited it, I did say skimmer not uv, so my old age is to blame!!

 

[SkiPro]

skimmer for sure and i would go with live rock to if you are willing to spend the money, it will only make things easier. as for uv i would not worry about it.

 

[skene]

Of the 3 mentioned. The one I would recommend the most is Live Rock. Only because the rock tends to bring bacteria which will break down the nasty fish poop.
You can live without a UV and a skimmer for a FO system as long as you stay on top of your water changes.
Fish only systems do not require much maintenance as compared to a reef system. If you ever decide to go reef, then thats where you want to put more emphasis into getting equipment like skimmers, uv, lighting (T5/PC/MH) reactors etc.
FO just keep it simple. LR to act as a filter, a wet/dry to remove some of the poop and you can put your filtation media in there, or a Hang on filter like an Aqua Clear.
Probably throw in a power head or two to make sure you have adequate aeration.
Thats about it.