Onion01;1625632; said:alright wise-@$$, you made a statement, and I am asking you to elaborate on it. Can you think outside the box for a second and help me understand why it is that gars don't do better in needlessly large tanks?
and what's with calling other fish stupid?
Deathcurl;1625730; said:Keep this thread civil please. No need to name call.
Polypterus;1625763; said:I'm claustrophobic I do not like boxes...
I really do not know a better way of saying it than I already have without having to spend the next 45 minutes writing a dissertation.
It is simple...They can do well in large tanks but it is highly unlikely one is going to provide the correct conditions. Be it Tank length, depth, width.. proper habitat structure etc...You provide it then the tank is conditionally correct you do not it is not conditionally correct.
Polypterus;1625787; said:Gar rule everything else drools.....
Polypterus;1625787; said:Gar rule everything else drools.....
pwmin;1626051; said:![]()
I didn't know fish could drool...you learn something new every day.
Polypterus;1625763; said:I'm claustrophobic I do not like boxes...
I really do not know a better way of saying it than I already have without having to spend the next 45 minutes writing a dissertation.
It is simple...They can do well in large tanks but it is highly unlikely one is going to provide the correct conditions. Be it Tank length, depth, width.. proper habitat structure etc...You provide it then the tank is conditionally correct you do not it is not conditionally correct.
chrisdef15;1633782; said:That explained nothing. Again how would a big tank not be good for gars? All those considerations are the exact same in a small tank so what you said made no sense. Are you saying the correct conditions for gars wont be met know matter what?