Not sure if folks here would find any interest in this, but I found this study on another forum. Pretty interesting so I thought I'd share! It took place in the 80s / early 90s and they covered several rivers along the Amazon basin. What really caught my attention is the ph and nitrate readings.
The study: ftp://daac.ornl.gov/data/lba/surf_hydro_and_water_chem/CAMREX/comp/Pre_LBA_CAMREX.pdf
The data: ftp://daac.ornl.gov/data/bluangel_harvest/camrex/data/chemistry/chemdata.txt
In the tables, you'll see that the Rio Negro has ph readings in the 4s!!!!
With nitrates, the highest reading I saw was for Rio Jurua at 22.8uM. I converted that as follows:
The study: ftp://daac.ornl.gov/data/lba/surf_hydro_and_water_chem/CAMREX/comp/Pre_LBA_CAMREX.pdf
The data: ftp://daac.ornl.gov/data/bluangel_harvest/camrex/data/chemistry/chemdata.txt
In the tables, you'll see that the Rio Negro has ph readings in the 4s!!!!
With nitrates, the highest reading I saw was for Rio Jurua at 22.8uM. I converted that as follows:
Nitrate (NO3) has a molecular mass of 62.0049 g/mol. So:
62mg/mmole = 62ug/umol
22.8uM = 22.8umol/L, so 22.8umol/L x 62ug/umol = 1414ug/L = 1.414mg/L.
Rounded off, this would be about 1.4mg/L, or 1.4ppm of nitrates (I think I did that right!)
That basically supports that nitrates are nonexistent in the wild. I still don't get how some guys justify having 40-80ppm in their tanks and saying it's ok
22.8uM = 22.8umol/L, so 22.8umol/L x 62ug/umol = 1414ug/L = 1.414mg/L.
Rounded off, this would be about 1.4mg/L, or 1.4ppm of nitrates (I think I did that right!)
That basically supports that nitrates are nonexistent in the wild. I still don't get how some guys justify having 40-80ppm in their tanks and saying it's ok