Tank Turnover

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
hybridtheoryd16;4191078; said:
All but the rediculously over stocked tanks will have no problem keeping ammonia and nitrate to undetectable levels with as little as 1-2 turnovers per hour.

But with such low turn overs there will be a ton of build up on the bottom and possible suspended sediment in the water column.

A turn over of around 5-7 will take care of 99% of the suspended junk in the water column and gives you much clearer water than a 1-2x turn over. But still does very little to stir up the mulm from the tank floor.

From my experience a turnover rate of around 12x or higher starts to keep the tank much cleaner over all.

In my side by side 125's I have 10x in one and about 20x in the other. Both have the same substrate, stock levels and decore. And the lower turnover tank needs a vacumming about every month or sooner. But the 20x tank has never needed a single substrate vaccing in the 3yrs its been up. The only time I have ever seen mulm on the tank floor is when i have moved drift wood.

So the question is...is it worth the extra money in power consumption and price to have a cleaner tank and save yourself a hour or so every so often vaccing the tank floor?

Some would say yes and some would say no.

Its personal preference

IMO removing media that cleans the water to get more flow would be pointless.

Thanks also for your take on this.

My loaches love current also, but I have a big powerhead and the FX5 outlet doing that already.:headbang2
 
I house several different species of catfish in my growout tank with a high turnover rate. They love the extra flow and the water with crystal clear. For instance, in my 55g I'm running a 9w UV sterilizer, two Emperor 400's and a powerhead. But don't think its completely necessery. I had the filters laying around and was curious what the outcome would be. I wouldn't spend the extra money just to say my turnover rate is 1x-2x.
 
SteveR;4191378; said:
Just wanted to know what the pros are doin'!
My 250g maintenance free tank is doing three turnovers. That's bragging rights that nobody is going to beat.
 
CHOMPERS;4191438; said:
My 250g maintenance free tank is doing three turnovers. That's bragging rights that nobody is going to beat.

Mine is 6. And I'm not bragging.:naughty:

I cant keep the sand from moving around the bottom of the tank, and every time the Oscar(14") swims in front of the return nozzles the flow blows him over. Thats some flow. But I have a cousin with 150g with 12x turnover and water you could literally drink. Seriously.
BTW, what excactly do you mean "maintenance free"?
 
It cleans itself. It cleans the gravel and changes its water. I have to change the filter once a month though.

...Oh, and I have to feed the fish too. But I'm not complaining.

I have a system of bare bottom tanks that is more maintenance free. That system has a different filter design that only needs to be cleaned once every nine months to a year.
 
SteveR;4194371; said:
3 an hour eh. You must be proud...
Kneel before the master.

bowing.gif
 
Bio filtration is taken care of with just a few 'turnovers' (1~3 times)...

Keeping the water column clear has as much to do with the mechanical media type and minimizing bypass as it does water flow. With fine media and minimal bypass this can be taken care of also with just a few 'turnovers' (2~4 times)...

But it requires additional flow to move physical waste from the floor of the tank to the filter intakes. It's difficult to slap a number on this as there are countless variables that come into play. Big fish have bigger poop that requires stronger currents to move it into the intakes (and vise versa). Custom designed intakes and returns can 'maximize efficiency' of the flow and thus do more with less. But if you are simply buying a filter off the shelf and putting it on your tank you will need more flow to do the same work.

Knowing Chompers I'm quite sure his 3 turnover tank is quite impressive. But I'm also sure it has a custom filter that cannot be compared to an 'off the shelf' version and thus I feel the way he is throwing his experience around is misleading the 'average Joe'...

No offense Chompers... :D
 
None taken.

My point is that torrents of current is not the only solution to a clean tank. There's too much over emphisis on high current and very little emphisis on quality systems.

My filters aren't anything special. They are designs that have been in the public domain for decades. They are big. They are also cheap. I built them for around the cost of a typical HOB filter.

The 'How To' threads of my systems are not kept secret either. I refer people to them on a regular basis.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com